+1. Katie Capps Parlante wrote: > In the architecture document, I used the term "domain model" instead of > "content model". This layer defines the domain specific schema: calendar > events, email messages, tasks, contacts, etc. The term "content model" > was OSAF specific. I strongly prefer "domain model" because that is a > more standard term. > > http://chandler.osafoundation.org/docs/0.6/overview.html > > Before I go do a bunch of wiki gardening and initiate any code changes, > I thought I'd do a sanity check. Do folks agree with this terminology > change? Please respond by Wednesday morning. > > Cheers, > Katie > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > > Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
