Ok, that was easy. I've logged Bug 5004 and Bug 5007 as the tasks for
updating this in code and devdocs/wiki, respectively.
Cheers,
Katie
Morgen Sagen wrote:
+1 for "domain model"
On Jan 16, 2006, at 12:27 PM, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
In the architecture document, I used the term "domain model" instead
of "content model". This layer defines the domain specific schema:
calendar events, email messages, tasks, contacts, etc. The term
"content model" was OSAF specific. I strongly prefer "domain model"
because that is a more standard term.
http://chandler.osafoundation.org/docs/0.6/overview.html
Before I go do a bunch of wiki gardening and initiate any code
changes, I thought I'd do a sanity check. Do folks agree with this
terminology change? Please respond by Wednesday morning.
Cheers,
Katie
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
