Hi Sheila,

Thanks for going through this triage. I reviewed each bug individually and, for the most part, I agree with the statement so I went ahead and modified the priorities as you suggested (so I'm ccing the dev list so that no one is surprised by this new round of triage).

I have no issues with the P2 bugs: all need to be addressed in 0.7. For the P3, I'm OK for most though there are 4 bugs I think shouldn't be raised to P3:

- Bug:4535 - Reminders with deltas greater than recurrence difference might not fire This is a rare corner case. There's no data loss really and I doubt any user will ever be bugged by such an occurence. P5.
- Bug 4947 - Reminder dialog flashes on launch
This is extremely minor and transitory. P4.
- Bug:3651 - Dragging event in Day view moves entire event into the current day This happens only in day view and only if an event straddles 2 days. Rare and no data loss. P5.
- Bug:3492 - Cursor displays columns in Calendar view as being resizable
Windows only and really hard to change wx native behavior. P5.

P3 Visual Polish: There's a smattering of bugs there that are on a different level of criticality than all the other P3. Most are currently marked P4, some P5 and some are already P3 in Bugzilla. I feel that promoting all of them to P3 wholesale is going to dilute the sense of urgency for the others (usability, missing features, etc...) so I'd rather leave their priorities untouched. I did however grabbed some from "Future" and put them back into "0.7". For all those Visual Polish issue, I also would prefer to spend time on a system for styling the UI (Bug:2981 - Help come up with a mechanism to store style info) which is currently a P3 Architecture item.

Cheers,
- Philippe

Sheila Mooney wrote:
Mimi and I spent some time last week going through all the dogfood feedback, features and bugs reported so far as well as many of the calendar bugs we have logged in bugzilla from 0.6. We have put together the following wiki page that groups all of these items based on the following prioritization.

1. Bugs/enhancements that prevent a user from experimenting with the app
2. Bugs/enhancements that prevent some users from dogfooding Chandler
3. Nice to haves for a usable calendar
4. Really nice to have for a "super-usable" calendar

http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Journal/CalendarBugsFeatures20060203

The known issues in group #1 we are addressing in Chandler 0.6.1. The items in group #2 we hope to prioritize for an early 0.7 milestone once we receive scoping/feedback from devs. If there are items people feel are missing or in the "nice-to-have" categories and should be re-prioritized, let us know. Please include some workflows/scenarios to support these.

It is reasonable to assume we will receive more feedback/bugs during the course of 0.7 and will update this list accordingly. Our goal is to bucketize what we know about now, get all these spec'd out and scoped.

Sheila
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to