> On Apr 25, 2018, at 12:54 AM, Otto van der Schaaf <osch...@we-amp.com> wrote: > > I have the same problem, but no solution. > One other problem I have is that it is easy to miss messages with IRC even > when I'm not > behind my desktop running the client.
znc helps nicely with that, and we (ATS) have an instance that I can create accounts on if anyone should need it. > > So I'm wondering if switching to Slack would help. If that is already being > used by others > and IRC is not, switching to Slack would avoid adding more channel types to > monitor. The problem I have with slack is the explosion of accounts that it causes, I’m already at 10+ accounts... I’m really not a fan of it, but if it’s what you all want to use, that’s fine. If we don’t want to use IRC, we should close down the channel. Cheers, — Leif > > Added +dev@ (for the records) > > Otto > >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 3:06 PM Joshua Marantz <jmara...@google.com> wrote: >> In principle this is a great idea. But the traffic has been relatively low >> and I have a bunch of different IRC channels to track, each one on a >> different platform (slack, 2 different Google ones, freenode). I really >> need some kind of federation mechanism for all these IRCs. Anyone have a >> good solution for that? >> >> >>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:47 AM Otto van der Schaaf <osch...@we-amp.com> >>> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Leif pointed out that there have been some people asking questions over at >>> #pagespeed on Freenode, but unfortunately no-one was there to help out. So >>> I wanted to gauge support for the channel, and if we're willing to support >>> people on IRC? >>> >>> The last couple of weeks I haven't hung out much in the channel, but I just >>> joined again and intend to do better again going forward.. but I can't hang >>> out in the channel 24x7 on my own :-) >>> >>> Any thoughts? Also, I'm curious of support for Slack would be higher >>> compared to support for IRC? >>> (If so, maybe we should consider switching) >>> >>> Otto >>>
