>> What do you mean about "formalized table specification"?

I am referring to a formal table specification with precise definitions. 
Specifically, I expect the implementation of 
https://github.com/apache/paimon/issues/3704.

> If necessary, I think we can initiate a separate discussion to
> establish the target for the 1.0.0 release. What state and constraints
> do we hope to achieve?

That would be appreciated.

On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, at 16:55, Jingsong Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If necessary, I think we can initiate a separate discussion to
> establish the target for the 1.0.0 release. What state and constraints
> do we hope to achieve?
>
> Best,
> Jingsong
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 4:40 PM Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Xuanwo,
>>
>> Thanks for raising this good point.
>>
>> I think we already have a stable table specification now. [1] After
>> the release of 1.0, we should aim for both forward and backward
>> compatibility. This means that new clients should be able to access
>> storage from older versions, and further, old clients should also be
>> able to access new storage, although this is recommended only when not
>> using new storage features.
>>
>> What do you mean about "formalized table specification"?
>>
>> [1] https://paimon.apache.org/docs/master/concepts/spec/overview/
>>
>> Best,
>> Jingsong
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 4:11 PM Xuanwo <xua...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Thanks a lot for driving this! May I ask what the 1.0 release entails? 
>> > What guarantees can we expect from this release?
>> >
>> > For instance, will the table specification be stabilized and remain free 
>> > of breaking changes until the next major version? Please note that we do 
>> > not yet have a formalized table specification.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, at 15:27, Jingsong Li wrote:
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > I started this voting to decide the next version is 1.0. (Now, 0.9.0
>> > > RC1 is under voting)
>> > >
>> > > Paimon has gone through nine iterations, and it's time to release 
>> > > version 1.0.
>> > >
>> > > The VOTE will pass after 3 binding approve.
>> > >
>> > > [ ] +1 approve
>> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>> > >
>> > > Thanks for your feedback.
>> > >
>> > > Best,
>> > > Jingsong
>> >
>> > --
>> > Xuanwo
>> >
>> > https://xuanwo.io/

-- 
Xuanwo

https://xuanwo.io/

Reply via email to