Great, thanks! That's all I need. On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, at 17:18, Jingsong Li wrote: > I got your point, the current documentation [1] is still too rough, we > need to further improve it until it provides a well-defined > specification (directly representing the storage format). > > We can add this requirement to the 1.0 release plan in the upcoming > discussions. > > [1] https://paimon.apache.org/docs/master/concepts/spec/overview/ > > Best, > Jingsong > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 5:10 PM Xuanwo <xua...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> What do you mean about "formalized table specification"? >> >> I am referring to a formal table specification with precise definitions. >> Specifically, I expect the implementation of >> https://github.com/apache/paimon/issues/3704. >> >> > If necessary, I think we can initiate a separate discussion to >> > establish the target for the 1.0.0 release. What state and constraints >> > do we hope to achieve? >> >> That would be appreciated. >> >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, at 16:55, Jingsong Li wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > If necessary, I think we can initiate a separate discussion to >> > establish the target for the 1.0.0 release. What state and constraints >> > do we hope to achieve? >> > >> > Best, >> > Jingsong >> > >> > On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 4:40 PM Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Xuanwo, >> >> >> >> Thanks for raising this good point. >> >> >> >> I think we already have a stable table specification now. [1] After >> >> the release of 1.0, we should aim for both forward and backward >> >> compatibility. This means that new clients should be able to access >> >> storage from older versions, and further, old clients should also be >> >> able to access new storage, although this is recommended only when not >> >> using new storage features. >> >> >> >> What do you mean about "formalized table specification"? >> >> >> >> [1] https://paimon.apache.org/docs/master/concepts/spec/overview/ >> >> >> >> Best, >> >> Jingsong >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 4:11 PM Xuanwo <xua...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > Thanks a lot for driving this! May I ask what the 1.0 release entails? >> >> > What guarantees can we expect from this release? >> >> > >> >> > For instance, will the table specification be stabilized and remain >> >> > free of breaking changes until the next major version? Please note that >> >> > we do not yet have a formalized table specification. >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, at 15:27, Jingsong Li wrote: >> >> > > Hi all, >> >> > > >> >> > > I started this voting to decide the next version is 1.0. (Now, 0.9.0 >> >> > > RC1 is under voting) >> >> > > >> >> > > Paimon has gone through nine iterations, and it's time to release >> >> > > version 1.0. >> >> > > >> >> > > The VOTE will pass after 3 binding approve. >> >> > > >> >> > > [ ] +1 approve >> >> > > [ ] +0 no opinion >> >> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >> >> > > >> >> > > Thanks for your feedback. >> >> > > >> >> > > Best, >> >> > > Jingsong >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Xuanwo >> >> > >> >> > https://xuanwo.io/ >> >> -- >> Xuanwo >> >> https://xuanwo.io/
-- Xuanwo https://xuanwo.io/
