+1(binding)

> 在 2026年5月16日,上午10:15,Jingsong Li <[email protected]> 写道:
> 
> +1 (binding)
> 
> Best,
> Jingsong
> 
>> On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 4:11 PM Nicholas Jiang <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> +1(binding).
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Nicholas Jiang
>> 
>>> On 2026/05/15 07:40:39 刘欣瑀 wrote:
>>> Hi Paimon community,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Following the earlier discussion thread [1], I'd like to call a vote on 
>>> accepting **paimon-cpp** as a sub-project of Apache Paimon.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ### Background
>>> Paimon-cpp is a high-performance C++ implementation of Apache Paimon, 
>>> developed by the Storage Service team at Alibaba. It is currently hosted at 
>>> https://github.com/alibaba/paimon-cpp under the Apache License 2.0. The 
>>> goal is to provide a native C++ library that allows native engines to 
>>> access Paimon lakehouse tables with high efficiency and less overhead. 
>>> Bringing paimon-cpp under the Apache Paimon project would help maintain 
>>> consistent format semantics, reduce the risk of ecosystem fragmentation, 
>>> and foster collaborative, cross-language development within the community.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ### Donation Plan
>>> As discussed, we plan to create a sub-project under Apache Paimon, split 
>>> the code into PRs and review them before merging into the repository.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ### Source Code
>>> - Current repository: https://github.com/alibaba/paimon-cpp
>>> - License: Apache License 2.0
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ### Vote
>>> Please vote on whether to accept paimon-cpp into the Apache Paimon project:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> - [ ] **+1** Accept paimon-cpp as a sub-project of Apache Paimon
>>> - [ ] **+0** No opinion
>>> - [ ] **-1** Do not accept (please provide specific comments)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> **Voting rules:**
>>> - At least **3 binding votes (+1) from PMC members** are required.
>>> - **No vetoes (-1) should remain unresolved.
>>> - The vote will be open for **at least 72 hours**.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [1] Discussion thread: 
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/mw84ltw65r2scb0smxgm1392v3gnqgyk
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Xinyu Liu

Reply via email to