Same here, I verified 1.8.1

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Yes, I verified 1.8.1
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Alex Levenson <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > sorry all, it's this one:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/parquet/apache-parquet-1.8.1-rc1/
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > * Checked sums, signature
> > > * Tarball builds, passes tests, and passes rat checks
> > >
> > > On 07/17/2015 02:51 PM, Alex Levenson wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi everyone,
> > >>
> > >> I propose the following RC to be released as official Apache Parquet
> > 1.8.1
> > >> release.
> > >>
> > >> The commit id is 4aba4dae7bb0d4edbcf7923ae1339f28fd3f7fcf
> > >> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-parquet-1.8.1
> > >> * https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/tree/apache-parquet-1.8.1
> > >> *
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/projects/repo?p=parquet-mr.git&a=commit&h=4aba4dae7bb0d4edbcf7923ae1339f28fd3f7fcf
> > >>
> > >> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
> > >> *
> > >>
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/parquet/apache-parquet-1.8.0-rc1/
> > >>
> > >> You can find the KEYS file here:
> > >> * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/parquet/KEYS
> > >>
> > >> Binary artifacts are staged in Nexus here:
> > >> *
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/parquet/parquet/
> > >>
> > >> This release includes fixes for critical bugs in 1.8.0, mainly:
> > >> PARQUET-336
> > >>
> > >> See CHANGES.md for the full changelog.
> > >>
> > >> Please download, verify, and test.
> > >>
> > >> Please vote by Tuesday July 21st
> > >>
> > >> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Parquet <VERSION>
> > >> [ ] +0
> > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
> > >>
> > >> Thanks!
> > >> Alex
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ryan Blue
> > > Software Engineer
> > > Cloudera, Inc.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alex Levenson
> > @THISWILLWORK
> >
>

Reply via email to