dev  

Messages by Thread

• [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet Burak Yavuz
  • Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet Eduard Tudenhöfner
  • Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet Anurag Mantripragada
  • Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet Burak Yavuz
• Q&A: How do format versions work? Ryan Blue
  • Re: Q&A: How do format versions work? Ryan Blue
  • Re: Q&A: How do format versions work? Ryan Blue
  • Re: Q&A: How do format versions work? Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: Q&A: How do format versions work? Ryan Blue
  • Re: Q&A: How do format versions work? Ryan Blue
  • Re: Q&A: How do format versions work? Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: Q&A: How do format versions work? Gunnar Morling
  • Re: Q&A: How do format versions work? Ryan Blue
• Proposal: Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: Proposal: Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Micah Kornfield
  • Re: Proposal: Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: Proposal: Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: Proposal: Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: Proposal: Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: Proposal: Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: Proposal: Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: Proposal: Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: Proposal: Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Antoine Pitrou
• Parquet Footer Working Group - session 4 Jiayi Wang
• [VOTE] Use versions to release forward-incompatible changes Ryan Blue
  • Re: [VOTE] Use versions to release forward-incompatible changes Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [VOTE] Use versions to release forward-incompatible changes Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [VOTE] Use versions to release forward-incompatible changes Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [VOTE] Use versions to release forward-incompatible changes Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [VOTE] Use versions to release forward-incompatible changes Ryan Blue
  • Re: [VOTE] Use versions to release forward-incompatible changes Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [VOTE] Use versions to release forward-incompatible changes Gunnar Morling
  • Re: [VOTE] Use versions to release forward-incompatible changes Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [VOTE] Use versions to release forward-incompatible changes Ryan Blue
  • Re: [VOTE] Use versions to release forward-incompatible changes Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [VOTE] Use versions to release forward-incompatible changes Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [VOTE] Use versions to release forward-incompatible changes Ryan Blue
  • Re: [VOTE] Use versions to release forward-incompatible changes Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [VOTE] Use versions to release forward-incompatible changes Julien Le Dem
• Preparing the Parquet board report for July Julien Le Dem
  • Re: Preparing the Parquet board report for July Julien Le Dem
• [DISCUSS] complete FILE proposal Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] complete FILE proposal Daniel Weeks
• [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync July 1st Julien Le Dem
  • Re: [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync July 1st Julien Le Dem
  • Re: [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync July 1st Gunnar Morling
  • Re: [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync July 1st Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync July 1st Julien Le Dem
  • Re: [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync July 1st Gunnar Morling
• [DISCUSS] Allow VARIANT value field to be omitted Zehua Zou
• Expected behavior for older parquet-java readers with VARIANT columns Kevin Liu
  • Re: Expected behavior for older parquet-java readers with VARIANT columns Micah Kornfield
  • Re: Expected behavior for older parquet-java readers with VARIANT columns Kevin Liu
  • Re: Expected behavior for older parquet-java readers with VARIANT columns Kevin Liu
  • Re: Expected behavior for older parquet-java readers with VARIANT columns Steve Loughran
  • Re: Expected behavior for older parquet-java readers with VARIANT columns Ed Seidl
• [DISCUSS] Variant Hardening: how deep is a realistic variant depth? Steve Loughran
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Variant Hardening: how deep is a realistic variant depth? Kurtis Wright
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Variant Hardening: how deep is a realistic variant depth? Steve Loughran
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Variant Hardening: how deep is a realistic variant depth? Gunnar Morling
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Variant Hardening: how deep is a realistic variant depth? Steve Loughran
• Announcing the release of Hardwood 1.0, a new Parquet reader for the JVM Gunnar Morling
  • Re: Announcing the release of Hardwood 1.0, a new Parquet reader for the JVM Steve Loughran
  • Re: Announcing the release of Hardwood 1.0, a new Parquet reader for the JVM Gunnar Morling
  • Re: Announcing the release of Hardwood 1.0, a new Parquet reader for the JVM Steve Loughran
  • Re: Announcing the release of Hardwood 1.0, a new Parquet reader for the JVM Pritam Pan
  • Re: Announcing the release of Hardwood 1.0, a new Parquet reader for the JVM Gunnar Morling
• [DISCUSS] Moving to SemVer for parquet-format releases Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to SemVer for parquet-format releases Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to SemVer for parquet-format releases Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to SemVer for parquet-format releases Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to SemVer for parquet-format releases Micah Kornfield
• [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Ryan Blue
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Ryan Blue
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Divjot Arora via dev
  • [RESULT][VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Micah Kornfield
• Parquet Footer Working Group - session 3 Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group - session 3 Manu Zhang
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group - session 3 Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group - session 3 Jiayi Wang
• AssertJ for Assertions in tests Eduard Tudenhöfner
  • Re: AssertJ for Assertions in tests Steve Loughran
  • Re: AssertJ for Assertions in tests Russell Spitzer
  • Re: AssertJ for Assertions in tests Steve Loughran
  • Re: AssertJ for Assertions in tests Eduard Tudenhöfner
  • Re: AssertJ for Assertions in tests Gunnar Morling
  • Re: AssertJ for Assertions in tests Eduard Tudenhöfner via dev
• [DISCUSS] Clarifying NaN bit preservation in floating-point encodings Gang Wu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Clarifying NaN bit preservation in floating-point encodings Gábor Szádovszky
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Clarifying NaN bit preservation in floating-point encodings Gang Wu
• Clarification on row-group and column-chunk layout Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Clarification on row-group and column-chunk layout Will Edwards via dev
  • Re: Clarification on row-group and column-chunk layout Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Clarification on row-group and column-chunk layout Will Edwards via dev
  • Re: Clarification on row-group and column-chunk layout Andrew Lamb
  • Re: Clarification on row-group and column-chunk layout Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Clarification on row-group and column-chunk layout Andrew Pikler
  • Re: Clarification on row-group and column-chunk layout Andrew Lamb
  • Re: Clarification on row-group and column-chunk layout Ed Seidl
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Parquet Format 2.13.0 Gang Wu
• Parquet Footer Working Group - session 2 Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group - session 2 Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group - session 2 Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group - session 2 Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group - session 2 Jiayi Wang
• [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.13.0 RC0 Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.13.0 RC0 Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.13.0 RC0 Neelesh Salian
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.13.0 RC0 Ed Seidl
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.13.0 RC0 Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.13.0 RC0 Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.13.0 RC0 Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.13.0 RC0 Gang Wu
• Document which features are in which versions of Parquet Andrew Lamb
  • Re: Document which features are in which versions of Parquet Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: Document which features are in which versions of Parquet Andrew Lamb
  • Re: Document which features are in which versions of Parquet Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: Document which features are in which versions of Parquet Andrew Lamb
  • Re: Document which features are in which versions of Parquet Andrew Lamb
• [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync June 17th Julien Le Dem
  • Re: [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync June 17th Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync June 17th Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync June 17th Julien Le Dem
• sync today Wednesday Jun 3rd Julien Le Dem
  • Re: sync today Wednesday Jun 3rd Julien Le Dem
• [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Bell
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Steve Loughran
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ed Seidl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Bell
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ed Seidl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Bell
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ed Seidl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Bell
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ed Seidl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield

• Earlier messages