dev  

Messages by Thread

• Draft board report for October Julien Le Dem
• Next Parquet sync tomorrow Wednesday Oct 7 Julien Le Dem
• [ANNOUNCE] Lakehouse Day EU 2026 Danica Fine
• Next Parquet sync tomorrow Wednesday Sep 22nd Julien Le Dem
• Proposal: classify `distinct_count` metadata as inexact Adrian Garcia Badaracco via dev
  • Re: Proposal: classify `distinct_count` metadata as inexact Andrew Lamb
  • Re: Proposal: classify `distinct_count` metadata as inexact Adrian Garcia Badaracco
  • Re: Proposal: classify `distinct_count` metadata as inexact Micah Kornfield
  • Re: Proposal: classify `distinct_count` metadata as inexact Russell Spitzer
  • Re: Proposal: classify `distinct_count` metadata as inexact Daniel Weeks
  • Re: Proposal: classify `distinct_count` metadata as inexact Andrew Lamb
  • Re: Proposal: classify `distinct_count` metadata as inexact Daniel Weeks
• Introducing the Parquet Modular Footer Jiayi Wang
• [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations PRATEEK GAUR
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations PRATEEK GAUR
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations PRATEEK GAUR
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations PRATEEK GAUR
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations PRATEEK GAUR
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations PRATEEK GAUR
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations (+ apologies) Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations (+ apologies) PRATEEK GAUR
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Breakdown of FastLanes for Parquet: Benchmark results and recommendations (+ apologies) Julien Le Dem
• Update the website for the 2.14 format release Andrew Lamb
• Adding implementation to support matrix Michael Chavinda
• Reminder: Footer Sync Coming Up Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Reminder: Footer Sync Coming Up Micah Kornfield
• [DISCUSS] WIRE: a logical type for serialized wire-format messages Neelesh Salian
  • Re: [DISCUSS] WIRE: a logical type for serialized wire-format messages Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] WIRE: a logical type for serialized wire-format messages Neelesh Salian
  • Re: [DISCUSS] WIRE: a logical type for serialized wire-format messages Micah Kornfield
• [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Will Edwards via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Andrew Bell
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? kurtiscwright
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Will Edwards via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Xiening Dai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Steve Loughran
  • Re: [DISCUSS] How should readers behave with unsupported format versions? Steve Loughran
• Notes from Parquet sync Wednesday Sep 9th 2026 Andrew Lamb
• Forward compatibility and roundtripping/rewriting parquet files Jörn Horstmann
  • Re: Forward compatibility and roundtripping/rewriting parquet files Gábor Szádovszky
  • Re: Forward compatibility and roundtripping/rewriting parquet files Jörn Horstmann
  • Re: Forward compatibility and roundtripping/rewriting parquet files Gábor Szádovszky
• Versioning discussion: Arrow IPC comparison Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: Versioning discussion: Arrow IPC comparison Antoine Pitrou
• [Need facilitator] Next Parquet sync tomorrow Wednesday Sep 9th Julien Le Dem
  • Re: [Need facilitator] Next Parquet sync tomorrow Wednesday Sep 9th Andrew Lamb
• [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Rok Mihevc
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Will Edwards via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Rok Mihevc
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Rok Mihevc
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Rok Mihevc
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Rok Mihevc
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Will Edwards via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Rok Mihevc
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Gang Wu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Philipp Fischbeck via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Sebastian Baunsgaard
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Will Edwards via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Philipp Fischbeck via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Steven Wu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Will Edwards via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Numeric Vector type: physical representation (outcome of focused call) Will Edwards via dev
• CVE-2026-73334: Apache Parquet Hadoop: File-controlled KMS URL is forwarded to pluggable KmsClient that skips host validation Gidon Gershinsky
• [VOTE] Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Stevo Mitrić via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [VOTE] Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [VOTE] Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Ryan Blue
  • Re: [VOTE] Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Gábor Szádovszky
  • Re: [VOTE] Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [VOTE] Extended Precision Nanosecond Timestamps Divjot Arora via dev
• [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.14.0 RC1 Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.14.0 RC1 László Bodor
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.14.0 RC1 Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.14.0 RC1 Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.14.0 RC1 Gábor Szádovszky
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.14.0 RC1 Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.14.0 RC1 Vinoo Ganesh
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.14.0 RC1 Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.14.0 RC1 Fokko Driesprong
• [RESULT][VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Divjot Arora via dev
• [DISCUSS] Parquet Format 2.14.0 release Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Parquet Format 2.14.0 release Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Parquet Format 2.14.0 release Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Parquet Format 2.14.0 release Gang Wu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Parquet Format 2.14.0 release Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Parquet Format 2.14.0 release Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Parquet Format 2.14.0 release Vinoo Ganesh
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Parquet Format 2.14.0 release Neelesh Salian
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Parquet Format 2.14.0 release Fokko Driesprong
• [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Matt Topol
  • Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Neelesh Salian
  • Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Jia Yu
  • Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations PRATEEK GAUR
  • Re: [VOTE] Specify handling for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations Ryan Blue
• Parquet Footer Sync – Session 5 Jiayi Wang
• [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Java 1.18.1 RC1 Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Java 1.18.1 RC1 Gábor Szádovszky
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Java 1.18.1 RC1 Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Java 1.18.1 RC1 Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Java 1.18.1 RC1 Peter Toth
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Java 1.18.1 RC1 Gidon Gershinsky
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Java 1.18.1 RC1 Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Java 1.18.1 RC1 Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Java 1.18.1 RC1 Yiming Li via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Java 1.18.1 RC1 Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Java 1.18.1 RC1 Neelesh Salian
• [RESULT][VOTE] Remove self-references from the FILE logical type Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
• Next Parquet sync tomorrow Wednesday Aug 26th Julien Le Dem
• [DISCUSS] Apache Parquet-Java 1.18.1 Fokko Driesprong
• [DISCUSS] Parquet Fokko Driesprong
• [VOTE] Remove self-references from the FILE logical type Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Remove self-references from the FILE logical type Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [VOTE] Remove self-references from the FILE logical type Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Remove self-references from the FILE logical type Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Remove self-references from the FILE logical type Rok Mihevc
  • Re: [VOTE] Remove self-references from the FILE logical type Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [VOTE] Remove self-references from the FILE logical type Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [VOTE] Remove self-references from the FILE logical type Burak Yavuz
  • Re: [VOTE] Remove self-references from the FILE logical type Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [VOTE] Remove self-references from the FILE logical type PRATEEK GAUR
  • Re: [VOTE] Remove self-references from the FILE logical type Ryan Blue
  • Re: [VOTE] Remove self-references from the FILE logical type Ed Seidl
  • Re: [VOTE] Remove self-references from the FILE logical type Julien Le Dem
  • Re: [VOTE] Remove self-references from the FILE logical type Zehua Zou
  • Re: [VOTE] Remove self-references from the FILE logical type Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE] Remove self-references from the FILE logical type wish maple
• [ALP] Blog -- Request for Review Kosta Tarasov
  • Re: [ALP] Blog -- Request for Review PRATEEK GAUR
  • Re: [ALP] Blog -- Request for Review Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [ALP] Blog -- Request for Review Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [ALP] Blog -- Request for Review Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [ALP] Blog -- Request for Review Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [ALP] Blog -- Request for Review Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [ALP] Blog -- Request for Review PRATEEK GAUR
  • Re: [ALP] Blog -- Request for Review Vinoo Ganesh
• [ALP] Move ALP spec to its own document page Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [ALP] Move ALP spec to its own document page PRATEEK GAUR
  • Re: [ALP] Move ALP spec to its own document page Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [ALP] Move ALP spec to its own document page Kevin Liu
• Canceling the August 18 Footer Sync Jiayi Wang
• [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Julien Le Dem
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Will Edwards via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Andrew Lamb
  • [DISCUSS] Writing the version number in the footer Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Writing the version number in the footer Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Writing the version number in the footer Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing the versioning proposal Ryan Blue

• Earlier messages