dev  

Messages by Thread

• [DISCUSS] Bump minimum Java version to 17 for Parquet Java Ismaël Mejía
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum Java version to 17 for Parquet Java Fokko Driesprong
• [DISCUSS] Apache Parquet 1.18.0 Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Parquet 1.18.0 Aaron Niskode-Dossett via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Parquet 1.18.0 Gang Wu
• Test Files? Andrew Bell
  • Re: Test Files? Curt Hagenlocher
• Parquet sync today Wednesday May 20th Julien Le Dem
  • Re: Parquet sync today Wednesday May 20th Vinoo Ganesh
  • Re: Parquet sync today Wednesday May 20th Julien Le Dem
• [VOTE] Adopt format change for PARQUET-2249: IEEE 754 total order & NaN-counts Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE] Adopt format change for PARQUET-2249: IEEE 754 total order & NaN-counts Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [VOTE] Adopt format change for PARQUET-2249: IEEE 754 total order & NaN-counts Steve Loughran
  • Re: [VOTE] Adopt format change for PARQUET-2249: IEEE 754 total order & NaN-counts Ed Seidl
  • Re: [VOTE] Adopt format change for PARQUET-2249: IEEE 754 total order & NaN-counts Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [VOTE] Adopt format change for PARQUET-2249: IEEE 754 total order & NaN-counts Julien Le Dem
  • Re: [VOTE] Adopt format change for PARQUET-2249: IEEE 754 total order & NaN-counts Matt Topol
  • Re: [VOTE] Adopt format change for PARQUET-2249: IEEE 754 total order & NaN-counts Xinli shang
  • Re: [VOTE] Adopt format change for PARQUET-2249: IEEE 754 total order & NaN-counts Gang Wu
• Parquet Footer Working Group Kickoff Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group Kickoff Raúl Cumplido
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group Kickoff Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group Kickoff Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group Kickoff Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group Kickoff Jiayi Wang
• [PR] [INFRA] Set up default rulesets for default and release branches [parquet-benchmark] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [INFRA] Set up default rulesets for default and release branches [parquet-benchmark] via GitHub
• hardening variant readers Steve Loughran
  • Re: hardening variant readers Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: hardening variant readers Steve Loughran
• [DISCUSS] how readers handle parquet files with future extensions in Will Edwards via dev
• Geography test files with statistics Dewey Dunnington
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Parquet Java 1.17.1 Gang Wu
• [Announce] New Committer: Ed Seidl Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [Announce] New Committer: Ed Seidl Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [Announce] New Committer: Ed Seidl Gang Wu
  • Re: [Announce] New Committer: Ed Seidl Raúl Cumplido
  • Re: [Announce] New Committer: Ed Seidl Ed Seidl
• [DISCUSS] AI tooling policy for Parquet Arnav Balyan
  • Re: [DISCUSS] AI tooling policy for Parquet Fokko Driesprong
• [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet-Java 1.17.1 RC0 Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet-Java 1.17.1 RC0 Steve Loughran
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet-Java 1.17.1 RC0 Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet-Java 1.17.1 RC0 Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet-Java 1.17.1 RC0 Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet-Java 1.17.1 RC0 Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet-Java 1.17.1 RC0 Xinli shang
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet-Java 1.17.1 RC0 Gang Wu
• Datasets Project - Raincloud Martin Prammer via dev
  • Re: Datasets Project - Raincloud Arnav Balyan
  • Re: Datasets Project - Raincloud Martin Prammer via dev
• [DISCUSS] Adding AGENTS.md to parquet-java Arnav Balyan
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Adding AGENTS.md to parquet-java Aaron Niskode-Dossett via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Adding AGENTS.md to parquet-java Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Adding AGENTS.md to parquet-java Aaron Niskode-Dossett via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Adding AGENTS.md to parquet-java Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Adding AGENTS.md to parquet-java Arnav Balyan
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Adding AGENTS.md to parquet-java Arnav Balyan
• Wide Schemas? Andrew Bell
  • Re: Wide Schemas? Andrew Lamb
  • Re: Wide Schemas? Adrian Garcia Badaracco via dev
  • Re: Wide Schemas? Steve Loughran
• [DISCUSS] GH-3547 - Automated Release for Parquet Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] GH-3547 - Automated Release for Parquet Arnav Balyan
  • Re: [DISCUSS] GH-3547 - Automated Release for Parquet Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] GH-3547 - Automated Release for Parquet Arnav Balyan
  • Re: [DISCUSS] GH-3547 - Automated Release for Parquet Gang Wu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] GH-3547 - Automated Release for Parquet Fokko Driesprong
• [DISCUSS] Remaining open spec level questions for ALP Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Remaining open spec level questions for ALP Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Remaining open spec level questions for ALP Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Remaining open spec level questions for ALP Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Remaining open spec level questions for ALP Micah Kornfield
• Parquet sync today Wednesday May 6th Julien Le Dem
  • Re: Parquet sync today Wednesday May 6th Julien Le Dem
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Arrow / Parquet meetup in Paris Antoine Pitrou
• Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow — is Parquet interested? rbowen
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow — is Parquet interested? Julien Le Dem
• [DISCUSS] Support non-contiguous pages in parquet Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Support non-contiguous pages in parquet Andrew Bell
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Support non-contiguous pages in parquet Adrian Garcia Badaracco via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Support non-contiguous pages in parquet Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Support non-contiguous pages in parquet Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Support non-contiguous pages in parquet Will Edwards via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Support non-contiguous pages in parquet Andrew Lamb
• Parquet Calendar, meeting guidelines and footer discussion Julien Le Dem
  • Re: Parquet Calendar, meeting guidelines and footer discussion Adam Reeve
  • Re: Parquet Calendar, meeting guidelines and footer discussion Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: Parquet Calendar, meeting guidelines and footer discussion Julien Le Dem
• Java performance optimization work — seeking code reviews Ismaël Mejía
  • Re: Java performance optimization work — seeking code reviews Steve Loughran
  • Re: Java performance optimization work — seeking code reviews Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: Java performance optimization work — seeking code reviews Steve Loughran
  • Re: Java performance optimization work — seeking code reviews Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: Java performance optimization work — seeking code reviews Ismaël Mejía
• Parquet sync tomorrow Wednesday Apr 22nd Julien Le Dem
  • Re: Parquet sync tomorrow Wednesday Apr 22nd Julien Le Dem
  • Re: Parquet sync tomorrow Wednesday Apr 22nd Manu Zhang
  • Re: Parquet sync tomorrow Wednesday Apr 22nd Micah Kornfield
  • Re: Parquet sync tomorrow Wednesday Apr 22nd Julien Le Dem
• kicking off workflows for PR 3481 Steve Loughran
• Is a too long RLE bitpack at the end of a page valid? Jan Finis
  • Re: Is a too long RLE bitpack at the end of a page valid? Raphael Taylor-Davies
  • Re: Is a too long RLE bitpack at the end of a page valid? Micah Kornfield
• [DISCUSS] new parquet-java release Manu Zhang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] new parquet-java release Steve Loughran
  • Re: [DISCUSS] new parquet-java release Steve Loughran
  • Re: [DISCUSS] new parquet-java release Aaron Niskode-Dossett via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] new parquet-java release Manu Zhang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] new parquet-java release Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [DISCUSS] new parquet-java release Julien Le Dem
  • Re: [DISCUSS] new parquet-java release Gang Wu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] new parquet-java release Rahil C
  • Re: [DISCUSS] new parquet-java release Gang Wu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] new parquet-java release Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [DISCUSS] new parquet-java release Gang Wu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] new parquet-java release Gang Wu
• Parquet Footer Options Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: Parquet Footer Options Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: Parquet Footer Options Will Edwards via dev
  • Re: Parquet Footer Options Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: Parquet Footer Options Andrew Lamb
  • Re: Parquet Footer Options Divjot Arora via dev
• Making path_in_schema optional Ed Seidl
  • Re: Making path_in_schema optional Gang Wu
  • Re: Making path_in_schema optional Steve Loughran
  • Re: Making path_in_schema optional Micah Kornfield
• [DISCUSS] Where should VariantJsonParser live? (GH-3414) Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Where should VariantJsonParser live? (GH-3414) Steve Loughran
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Where should VariantJsonParser live? (GH-3414) Gang Wu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Where should VariantJsonParser live? (GH-3414) Steve Loughran
• Next parquet sync conflicts with the Iceberg summit Julien Le Dem
  • Re: Next parquet sync conflicts with the Iceberg summit Julien Le Dem
  • Re: Next parquet sync conflicts with the Iceberg summit Andrew Lamb
  • Re: Next parquet sync conflicts with the Iceberg summit Julien Le Dem
  • Re: Next parquet sync conflicts with the Iceberg summit Steve Loughran
  • Re: Next parquet sync conflicts with the Iceberg summit Andrew Lamb
  • Parquet Sync Notes 2026-04-08 (as Next parquet sync conflicts with the Iceberg summit) Andrew Lamb
• Auto-detecting list encodings in Parquet files Claire McGinty
  • Re: Auto-detecting list encodings in Parquet files Gang Wu
  • Re: Auto-detecting list encodings in Parquet files Claire McGinty
  • Re: Auto-detecting list encodings in Parquet files Gang Wu
  • Re: Auto-detecting list encodings in Parquet files Claire McGinty
• Compressing bloom filters Adrian Garcia Badaracco
  • Re: Compressing bloom filters Micah Kornfield
  • Re: Compressing bloom filters Steve Loughran
  • Re: Compressing bloom filters Adrian Garcia Badaracco via dev
  • Re: Compressing bloom filters Steve Loughran
  • Re: Compressing bloom filters Andrew Lamb
  • Re: Compressing bloom filters Adrian Garcia Badaracco via dev
  • Re: Compressing bloom filters Adrian Garcia Badaracco via dev
• is it (VARIANT) or (VARIANT(1))? Steve Loughran
  • Re: is it (VARIANT) or (VARIANT(1))? Andrew Lamb
  • Re: is it (VARIANT) or (VARIANT(1))? Aihua Xu
  • Re: is it (VARIANT) or (VARIANT(1))? Steve Loughran
  • Re: is it (VARIANT) or (VARIANT(1))? Steve Loughran
• Parquet Draft report April 2026 Julien Le Dem
  • Re: Parquet Draft report April 2026 Arnav Balyan
  • Re: Parquet Draft report April 2026 Julien Le Dem
• [ANNOUNCE] Seattle Parquet Meetup on May 4th Micah Kornfield
• [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Will Edwards via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Ed Seidl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Jan Finis
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Will Edwards via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Will Edwards via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Will Edwards via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Ed Seidl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Raphael Taylor-Davies
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Ed Seidl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Will Edwards via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Andrew Bell
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Ed Seidl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Pierre Lacave
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index 王嘉仪
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Ed Seidl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Steve Loughran
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • RE: Re: [DISCUSS] Alternative to FlatBuffer Footer: A Lightweight Byte-Offset Index Jiayi Wang
• Parquet sync tomorrow Wednesday Mar 24th Julien Le Dem
  • Re: Parquet sync tomorrow Wednesday Mar 24th Steve Loughran
  • Re: Parquet sync tomorrow Wednesday Mar 24th Julien Le Dem
• [DISCUSSION] Clarifying CRS string formats in Geospatial Types Milan Stefanovic
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Clarifying CRS string formats in Geospatial Types Jia Yu
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Clarifying CRS string formats in Geospatial Types Dewey Dunnington
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Clarifying CRS string formats in Geospatial Types Milan Stefanovic
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Clarifying CRS string formats in Geospatial Types Dewey Dunnington
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Clarifying CRS string formats in Geospatial Types Milan Stefanovic
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Clarifying CRS string formats in Geospatial Types Milan Stefanovic
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Clarifying CRS string formats in Geospatial Types Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Clarifying CRS string formats in Geospatial Types Micah Kornfield
• Lakehouse day at Community over Code in Glasgow (Oct 10) Julien Le Dem
• Parquet sync today Wednesday Mar 11th Julien Le Dem
  • Re: Parquet sync today Wednesday Mar 11th Julien Le Dem
• [DISCUSS] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet Burak Yavuz
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet Antoine Pitrou

• Earlier messages