Yeah, I'm in as well.

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Jason Altekruse <[email protected]>
wrote:

> While I am not a committer, and would need to ask some questions along the
> way, I would be willing to sign up for triaging to get more involved with
> the project.
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Daniel Weeks <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm in as well.
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > This sounds good to me.
> > > I'd sign up for triaging.
> > > The more the merrier!
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > In the Parquet sync-up today, we were talking about how to keep up
> with
> > > > bugs and patches. The idea is that we don't want to scramble getting
> > them
> > > > all done in the weeks before a release. That delays our releases and
> > > > doesn't get back to contributors soon enough, while they are most
> > likely
> > > to
> > > > continue contributing.
> > > >
> > > > I think one way to avoid the problem is to sign up for triaging
> issues
> > > and
> > > > contributions on a weekly schedule. The person who is signed up would
> > > watch
> > > > for bug reports and contributions for a week and make sure it gets
> > > > addressed. That could mean fixing small bugs or finding the right
> > person
> > > to
> > > > do a review and getting confirmation they are looking at it. We
> should
> > > also
> > > > be sure to mark issues in JIRA so we know what are release blockers
> as
> > > they
> > > > come in.
> > > >
> > > > I think a weekly rotation can be a good way to make sure this gets
> > done,
> > > > but it depends on having volunteers that like the idea and would sign
> > up.
> > > >
> > > > What does everyone think? Would you sign up for one week every 2
> months
> > > or
> > > > so?
> > > >
> > > > rb
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Ryan Blue
> > > > Software Engineer
> > > > Cloudera, Inc.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Julien
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to