[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15130055#comment-15130055
]
flykobe cheng edited comment on PARQUET-460 at 2/3/16 8:58 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for your reply, [~rdblue]! It’s what we want!
And do you mind I wrapper a MergeCommand in parquet-tool, or spark?
was (Author: flykobe):
Thank you for your reply, @Ryan Blue! It’s what we want!
And do you mind I wrapper a MergeCommand in parquet-tool, or spark?
> Parquet files concat tool
> -------------------------
>
> Key: PARQUET-460
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-460
> Project: Parquet
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: parquet-mr
> Affects Versions: 1.7.0, 1.8.0
> Reporter: flykobe cheng
> Assignee: flykobe cheng
>
> Currently the parquet file generation is time consuming, most of time used
> for serialize and compress. It cost about 10mins to generate a 100MB~ parquet
> file in our scenario. We want to improve write performance without generate
> too many small files, which will impact read performance.
> We propose to:
> 1. generate several small parquet files concurrently
> 2. merge small files to one file: concat the parquet blocks in binary
> (without SerDe), merge footers and modify the path and offset metadata.
> We create ParquetFilesConcat class to finish step 2. It can be invoked by
> parquet.tools.command.ConcatCommand. If this function approved by parquet
> community, we will integrate it in spark.
> It will impact compression and introduced more dictionary pages, but it can
> be improved by adjusting the concurrency of step 1.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
