When would the fix be ready by to consider it for release in 1.9.0? This affects correctness on current master of spark and would be good to get a release with it fixed so that people aren’t using potentially bad versions.
- Robert On 9/8/16, 10:44 PM, "Jacques Nadeau" <[email protected]> wrote: A non-binding +1 from me on releasing sooner/more often. On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I'd like to put together a release candidate for 1.9.0. The other issues > are done, but the sort order min/max issue, PARQUET-686 is still open. > > I'm okay releasing 1.9.0 without fixing that issue since it's been so long > since our last release. It would also be nice to do releases as necessary, > so we can always do a release to fix PARQUET-686 when the patch for it is > ready. Is there anyone that thinks we should definitely get this into the > 1.9.0 release? > > Thanks, > > rb > > -- > Ryan Blue > Software Engineer > Netflix >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
