Since we track releases in JIRA, the contributors are listed there. I'm in
favor of moving this stuff to github through the new Apache/Github
integration, but we just haven't done that yet.

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Zoltan Ivanfi <z...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> I can see the value of setting the assignee while working on an issue (so
> that the ongoing effort is clearly visible, which helps avoiding wasted
> effort), but what is purpose of setting the assignee after the JIRA is
> fixed? The commit itself (referenced from the JIRA as well) clearly
> identifies the author.
>
> I really like this aspect of the merge script that it handles both git and
> JIRA at the same time.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Zoltan
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:55 PM Ryan Blue <rb...@netflix.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> I've marked format-2.4.0 released in JIRA. Thanks for pointing out that it
>> hadn't been done.
>>
>> For the PR merge script, please don't use it to close issues. In fact, we
>> should remove that. Part of closing an issue is making sure the
>> contributor
>> is assigned the issue in JIRA, but the script can't do that. I always opt
>> to go close the issue by hand and take care of this through the web UI.
>>
>> rb
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:04 AM, Zoltan Ivanfi <z...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > When resolving JIRAs using the dev/merge_parquet_pr.py script, one has
>> to
>> > specify a fix version, otherwise the script will use format-2.4.0,
>> which is
>> > already released. There is no good choice for the fix version as
>> > format-2.4.0 is the largest version number JIRA knows about (and in
>> fact it
>> > lists it as an unreleased version).
>> >
>> > I would have two questions:
>> > - What version number should be added as the next unreleased version?
>> > - Who can edit the version numbers in JIRA?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Zoltan
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ryan Blue
>> Software Engineer
>> Netflix
>>
>


-- 
Ryan Blue
Software Engineer
Netflix

Reply via email to