[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16372577#comment-16372577
 ] 

Zoltan Ivanfi commented on PARQUET-1234:
----------------------------------------

[~rdblue], I suggest we decide this on the Parquet sync next week.

I hope PARQUET-1222 will not take that long to resolve as I already have a 
proposal in the JIRA description and I would like to create a PR early next 
week. Then we can discuss it in the Parquet sync and if everyone agrees to the 
proposal, we may resolve that issue by end of next week.

If, on the other hand, the community will raise problems, concerns, or new 
alternatives, the fix will take more time, and we may consider an earlier 
release as well. However, even if we don't introduce a new ordering in the next 
release, we should still clarify the specification by explicitly calling out 
this ambiguity and the countermeasures that have to be taken to deal with the 
consequences (basically the last bullet list in the description of 
PARQUET-1222). And I think this is a significant change in itself that may 
deserve a minor version change. 

> Release Parquet format 2.5.0
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: PARQUET-1234
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1234
>             Project: Parquet
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: parquet-format
>    Affects Versions: format-2.5.0
>            Reporter: Gabor Szadovszky
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: format-2.5.0
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to