Correct. On my side, this is solely developed on my own time and equipment. No employer will be able to claim the copyright. @Ivan: how about your side?
Thanks, Chao On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Ryan Blue <rb...@netflix.com> wrote: > Well, that was easy. No employers that might be able to claim copyright? > > It sounds like we will just need to start a resolution on the Incubator's > general list to accept the code and have you and Ivan sign ICLAs. > > rb > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Thanks Ryan. The code is currently owned by me, and is being worked by >> Ivan and myself. Yes, I believe both of us will continue working on it >> after moving to Apache. >> >> Best, >> Chao >> >> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Ryan Blue <rb...@netflix.com.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> Chao, >>> >>> From looking at the doc that Wes sent, I think the first thing to do is >>> to >>> find out who own copyright for the code that would be imported. Then we >>> would plan how to get grants or license agreements from copyright >>> holders, >>> and finally start a resolution in the incubator to accept the code. >>> >>> So I guess the question is: who owns the code and will those people or >>> organizations work on it once it is moved to Apache? >>> >>> rb >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:06 PM, Chao Sun <chao.apa...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Thanks Wes. We are ready to start the IP clearance - can some PMC help >>> to >>> > guide through the process? >>> > >>> > Best, >>> > Chao >>> > >>> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > hi Ivan and Chao, >>> > > >>> > > Since this work is ongoing for more than a year, it would be best to >>> > > conduct an IP clearance to import it into the Apache Parquet project >>> > > (http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/). >>> > > >>> > > One or more members of the PMC will need to assist with this to >>> > > prepare the documentation for the IP review and to initiate the >>> > > process. >>> > > >>> > > It is OK for the library to not be feature complete. >>> > > >>> > > Thanks >>> > > Wes >>> > > >>> > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 3:39 AM, Ivan Sadikov < >>> ivan.sadi...@gmail.com> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > > Hi Chao, >>> > > > >>> > > > Great to hear that you are pushing this forward. >>> > > > Apologies for not forwarding the email thread earlier. >>> > > > >>> > > > I will try fixing some issues of the milestone 1, so that we could >>> have >>> > > the >>> > > > read part complete. >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > Cheers, >>> > > > >>> > > > Ivan >>> > > > On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 at 5:33 PM, Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > >> Hi, >>> > > >> >>> > > >> Just joined this mailing list. Ivan and me have been working on a >>> Rust >>> > > >> implementation of Parquet <https://github.com/sunchao/parquet-rs> >>> for >>> > > some >>> > > >> time. It still lacks many features but the eventual goal is to >>> > > contribute >>> > > >> it to the Apache community. >>> > > >> >>> > > >> I saw a few weeks ago there's a discussion between Ivan and Wes >>> about >>> > > this >>> > > >> topic, and wonder what is the required steps to realize this. Is >>> it OK >>> > > if >>> > > >> it is not feature complete yet? >>> > > >> >>> > > >> Thanks, >>> > > >> Chao >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ryan Blue >>> Software Engineer >>> Netflix >>> >> >> > > > -- > Ryan Blue > Software Engineer > Netflix >
