Yeah, Spark would (I think) prefer a 1.8.3. I'd be happy to drive the release, but not clear if it's restricted to PMC members or committers to do (particularly, tagging in the repository probably requires write access).
On 12 April 2018 at 14:48, Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it would be better to do a 1.8.2 (or is it 1.8.3?) because Spark is > on the 1.8 line. I doubt Spark is going to move to 1.9 now that 1.10 is > out. > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > If someone wants a 1.9.1 it can be done, we'll need someone to own the > > release process though. > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Henry Robinson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Thanks! Sorry to miss the vote - was AFK for a few days. I look forward > to > >> testing it out anyhow. > >> > >> On 5 April 2018 at 14:28, Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > I just sent a vote for this. Took longer than expected because I had > to > >> > fix all of the javadoc warnings for java 8. Please test it out and > vote. > >> > > >> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Ryan Blue <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> I have no plan for 1.9.1. > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 10:42 AM, Henry Robinson <[email protected] > > > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Great! Do you know of any plans to do a 1.9.1? > >> >>> > >> >>> On 30 March 2018 at 09:35, Ryan Blue <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> I'm planning on getting a 1.10.0 rc out today, if I don't find > >> problems > >> >>>> with the stats changes. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Henry Robinson <[email protected]> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > Hi all - > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > While using Spark, I got hit by PARQUET-1217 today on some data > >> >>>> written by > >> >>>> > Impala. This is a pretty nasty bug, and one that affects Apache > >> Spark > >> >>>> right > >> >>>> > now because, AFAICT, there's no release to move to that contains > >> the > >> >>>> fix, > >> >>>> > and parquet-mr 1.9.0 is affected. There is a workaround, but it's > >> >>>> expensive > >> >>>> > in terms of lost performance. > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > I'm new to the community, so wanted to see if there was a plan to > >> >>>> make a > >> >>>> > release (1.9.1?) in the near future. I'd rather that than have to > >> >>>> build > >> >>>> > short-term workarounds into Spark. > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > Best, > >> >>>> > Henry > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> -- > >> >>>> Ryan Blue > >> >>>> Software Engineer > >> >>>> Netflix > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Henry Robinson > >> >>> Software Engineer > >> >>> Cloudera > >> >>> 415-994-6679 <(415)%20994-6679> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Ryan Blue > >> >> Software Engineer > >> >> Netflix > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Ryan Blue > >> > Software Engineer > >> > Netflix > >> > > >> > > > > > > > -- > Ryan Blue > Software Engineer > Netflix >
