hi Tham -- I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-4302 about adding OpenSSL to the build toolchain. Let's discuss there
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 8:33 PM tham <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Thank you all for very quick process. I really appriciated that. > > > I haven't seen the C++ encryption PR updated in a while. Have you been > doing development on this somewhere else? > Sorry, I’ve been working silently in our own repo, but still some small > fixes. I’m waiting for review process, then Gidon and I will discuss about > detailed implementation for the update. > > Moreover, I have some difficulties in update CMakeList about adding flexible > OpenSSL thirdparty. It will be great if someone who has experiences with > Cmake can help. > > Thanks, > Tham > > From: Wes McKinney > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 12:15 AM > To: Parquet Dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Modular Encryption design sign-off > > +1 (binding). Sorry for the delay in reviewing. There are a lot of > moving parts here and different configurations (same key for footer > and columns, different keys, plaintext footer, etc.) and so the > implementations are justifiably going to be a lot of work. > > @Tham, per your comment > > > We are going to release our product with encrypted parquet soon > > I haven't seen the C++ encryption PR updated in a while. Have you been > doing development on this somewhere else? > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 8:37 PM [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I’m working on C++ parquet encryption module and my project at Emotiv is > > currently using it in development phase. We are going to release our > > product with encrypted parquet soon. So I’ll appreciate a lot if we can > > process voting procedure on crypto specification as soon as possible, then > > we can continue with implementation and Java-C++ interop testing. > > > > Many thanks, > > Tham > > > > On 2019/01/08 17:08:01, Xinli shang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Can we have one more binding votes to sign off the encryption design to > > > let > > > us move on to implementation? Or, if you think 2 current binding votes > > > can > > > also be considered as sign off in this particular case, given this design > > > has been extensively discussed in a year and we have tested it in our > > > staging environment with privates, please let us know. > > > > > > Once we are unblocked, we will work on the implementation and integration > > > with our security ecosystem. Maybe someday, we can show the community how > > > Parquet encryption can work in large scale production. I would be really > > > appreciated if we can be unblocked. > > > > > > Xinli > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 9:58 AM Gidon Gershinsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > This is to remind that we have 2 binding votes - and need one more in > > > > order > > > > to sign off the encryption. > > > > > > > > Cheers, Gidon. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 10:13 AM Zoltan Ivanfi > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your efforts, Gidon! > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:55 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for all your work on this, Gidon! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:48 AM Gidon Gershinsky <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Parquet developers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After a productive round of discussions, we have a new enhanced > > > > version > > > > > > of > > > > > > > the design document. You can find it here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/ggershinsky/parquet-format/blob/p1450-crypto-specification/Encryption.md > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a call for vote (either new, or resumption of the previous > > > > one. > > > > > > If > > > > > > > you have voted +1 before, feel free to do that again :). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, Gidon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > > > > > > From: Gidon Gershinsky <[email protected]> > > > > > > > Date: Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 11:11 AM > > > > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Modular Encryption design sign-off > > > > > > > To: <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Parquet developers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Per the last sync discussion, it is time to call for a vote on the > > > > > > Parquet > > > > > > > Modular Encryption design sign-off. The design doc can be found at > > > > the > > > > > > > encryption branch of the parquet-format repository, > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/blob/encryption/Encryption.md > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The design is stable by now. This work had started 10 months ago, > > > > > > > has > > > > > > been > > > > > > > extensively reviewed - and implemented (in Java, partially in > > > > > > > C++), > > > > > by a > > > > > > > number of folks from different companies. To continue with the > > > > > > > implementation pull requests, we need the design to be formally > > > > signed > > > > > > off > > > > > > > by the community. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, Gidon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Ryan Blue > > > > > > Software Engineer > > > > > > Netflix > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Xinli Shang > > > >
