[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xinli Shang updated PARQUET-1681:
---------------------------------
Description:
When using the Avro schema below to write a parquet(1.8.1) file and then read
back by using parquet 1.10.1 without passing any schema, the reading throws an
exception "XXX is not a group" . Reading through parquet 1.8.1 is fine.
{
"name": "phones",
"type": [
"null",
{
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "record",
"name": "phones_items",
"fields": [
{ "name": "phone_number",
"type": [ "null", "string"
], "default": null
}
]
}
}
],
"default": null
}
The code to read is as below
val reader =
AvroParquetReader._builder_[SomeRecordType](parquetPath).withConf(*new*
Configuration).build()
reader.read()
PARQUET-651 changed the method isElementType() by relying on Avro's
checkReaderWriterCompatibility() to check the compatibility. However,
checkReaderWriterCompatibility() consider the ParquetSchema and the
AvroSchema(converted from File schema) as not compatible(the name in avro
schema is ‘phones_items’, but the name is ‘array’ in Parquet schema, hence not
compatible) . Hence return false and caused the “phone_number” field in the
above schema to be considered as group type which is not true. Then the
exception throws as .asGroupType().
I didn’t try writing via parquet 1.10.1 would reproduce the same problem or
not. But it could because the translation of Avro schema to Parquet schema is
not changed(didn’t verify yet).
I hesitate to revert PARQUET-651 because it solved several problems. I would
like to hear the community's thoughts on it.
was:
When using the Avro schema below to write a parquet(1.8.1) file and then read
back by using parquet 1.10.1 without passing any schema, the reading throws an
exception "XXX is not a group" . Reading throw parquet 1.8.1 is fine.
{
"name": "phones",
"type": [
"null",
{
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "record",
"name": "phones_items",
"fields": [
{
"name": "phone_number",
"type": [
"null",
"string"
],
"default": null
}
]
}
}
],
"default": null
}
The code to read is as below
val reader =
AvroParquetReader._builder_[SomeRecordType](parquetPath).withConf(*new*
Configuration).build()
reader.read()
PARQUET-651 changed the method isElementType() by relying on Avro's
checkReaderWriterCompatibility() to check the compatibility. However,
checkReaderWriterCompatibility() consider the ParquetSchema and the
AvroSchema(converted from File schema) as not compatible(the name in avro
schema is ‘phones_items’, but the name is ‘array’ in Parquet schema, hence not
compatible) . Hence return false and caused the “phone_number” field in the
above schema to be considered as group type which is not true. Then the
exception throws as .asGroupType().
I didn’t try writing via parquet 1.10.1 would reproduce the same problem or
not. But it could because the translation of Avro schema to Parquet schema is
not changed(didn’t verify yet).
I hesitate to revert PARQUET-651 because it solved several problems. I would
like to hear the community's thoughts on it.
> Avro's isElementType() change breaks the reading of some parquet(1.8.1) files
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PARQUET-1681
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1681
> Project: Parquet
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: parquet-avro
> Affects Versions: 1.10.0, 1.9.1, 1.11.0
> Reporter: Xinli Shang
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.11.0
>
>
> When using the Avro schema below to write a parquet(1.8.1) file and then read
> back by using parquet 1.10.1 without passing any schema, the reading throws
> an exception "XXX is not a group" . Reading through parquet 1.8.1 is fine.
> {
> "name": "phones",
> "type": [
> "null",
> {
> "type": "array",
> "items": {
> "type": "record",
> "name": "phones_items",
> "fields": [
>
> { "name": "phone_number",
> "type": [ "null",
> "string" ], "default": null
> }
> ]
> }
> }
> ],
> "default": null
> }
> The code to read is as below
> val reader =
> AvroParquetReader._builder_[SomeRecordType](parquetPath).withConf(*new*
> Configuration).build()
> reader.read()
> PARQUET-651 changed the method isElementType() by relying on Avro's
> checkReaderWriterCompatibility() to check the compatibility. However,
> checkReaderWriterCompatibility() consider the ParquetSchema and the
> AvroSchema(converted from File schema) as not compatible(the name in avro
> schema is ‘phones_items’, but the name is ‘array’ in Parquet schema, hence
> not compatible) . Hence return false and caused the “phone_number” field in
> the above schema to be considered as group type which is not true. Then the
> exception throws as .asGroupType().
> I didn’t try writing via parquet 1.10.1 would reproduce the same problem or
> not. But it could because the translation of Avro schema to Parquet schema is
> not changed(didn’t verify yet).
> I hesitate to revert PARQUET-651 because it solved several problems. I would
> like to hear the community's thoughts on it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
