Thanks a lot, Antoine for the summary and heads up. #166 is merged already. The others do not seem to be crucial for the next release but I am fine waiting a bit for the authors' response. (parquet-format thrift bump is not really important because even though we are releasing the generated java classes we are not using them in parquet-mr so this is mainly a testing issue.) "Core features" is clearly not in a shape to be finalized soon so we can postpone it to the release after.
Cheers, Gabor On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:58 PM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: > > > Hi Gabor, > > Ok, I went through the open PRs. The following PR seem basically ready, > just waiting for final feedback (and possible updates) from the > submitters: > > * https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/166 > (PARQUET-1969: Migrate testing from Travis-CI to Github Actions) > > * https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/158 > (PARQUET-1779: Update merge script) > > The following PR needs polishing; I'll wait for feedback from the > submitter and if there is none, will probably push an update myself: > > * https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/162 > (PARQUET-1930: Bump Apache Thrift to 0.13.0) > > Of the remaining PRs: > > * https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/164 looks desirable but > is still in draft state, and I assume will require a bit more > massaging and/or a final agreement (and perhaps a formal vote?) > (PARQUET-1950: Define core features) > > * there are a couple of proposed format additions which don't seem to > have gathered a lot of interest, and are therefore most probably out > of scope for a forthcoming release > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > > On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:07:44 +0200 > Gabor Szadovszky <ga...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Antoine, > > > > There are a couple of ongoing PRs in the parquet-format repo. However, > > some may take very long (e.g. core features) but some are only waiting > > for review (e.g. #166). > > I agree that solving the current situation of LZ4 is worth a > > parquet-format release but the ready PRs should also be included. > > > > Practically any committer can work on a release. (See > > http://parquet.apache.org/documentation/how-to-release/ for details.) > > As per the process PMC members are only required to vote on the > > release. > > > > Regards, > > Gabor > > > > >
