hi Gabor — I think you may need to be a PMC member? I'm not sure though.

+1 (binding), verified signature and checksum on the artifact

On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 10:19 AM Gabor Szadovszky <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I've updated the KEYS file with your public key in the release repo (
> downloads.apache.org is updated already). Please keep in mind that you will
> still need write access to the release repo to finalize the release after
> the vote passes. Guys, any idea how to request write access to a repo?
>
> Verified checksum and signature; unit tests pass; parquet-mr builds with
> the new RC.
> +1(binding)
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 4:51 PM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Ok, I've tried multiple variations and I still can't commit to the
> > release repository.
> >
> > May I ask you to commit the following patch:
> > https://gist.github.com/pitrou/0f9f1ffe280cfb48ea9427ebec19b65e
> >
> > You can check that the key block matches the one I added in the dev
> > repo.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Antoine.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 16:35:16 +0200
> > Gabor Szadovszky
> > <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > I don't have too much experience in svn. I usually follow the commands
> > > listed in the how to release doc and it works for me. (Don't remember if
> > > I've had to do some initial steps.) As a committer you should have write
> > > access to all the repositories of the Parquet community.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 4:18 PM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Ah!  It seems I can't push to that repo:
> > > >
> > > > Sending        KEYS
> > > > Transmitting file data .svn: E195023: Commit failed (details follow):
> > > > svn: E195023: Changing file
> > '/home/antoine/apache/parquet-release/KEYS' is
> > > > forbidden by the server
> > > > svn: E175013: Access to
> > > > '/repos/dist/!svn/txr/46918-13e8/release/parquet/KEYS' forbidden
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The URL I used for checkout is
> > > > https://[email protected]/repos/dist/release/parquet
> > > > Should I use another one?
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Antoine.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 16:00:26 +0200
> > > > Gabor Szadovszky
> > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Sorry, I've missed you updated the dev repo. The downloads page
> > mirrors
> > > > the
> > > > > release repo. Yet another place (besides the parquet-format and
> > > > parquet-mr
> > > > > repos) where we store a KEYS file for whatever reason. Please update
> > the
> > > > > one in the release repo.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:47 PM Gabor Szadovszky <
> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I guess it only requires some time to sync. Last time the release
> > > > tarball
> > > > > > required ~1hour to sync.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:42 PM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]>
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Hi Gabor,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Ok, I updated the KEYS file in the Parquet SVN repository.
> > > > > >> The changes do appear in
> > > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/parquet/KEYS -- but not in
> > > > > >> https://downloads.apache.org/parquet/KEYS .  Is there any
> > additional
> > > > > >> step I should perform?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Regards
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Antoine.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:19:24 +0200
> > > > > >> Gabor Szadovszky <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Hi Antoine,
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Thanks for initiating this release! You need to update the
> > listed
> > > > KEYS
> > > > > >> file
> > > > > >> > with your public key otherwise we cannot validate the
> > signature.
> > > > (To do
> > > > > >> > that you need to update the releases svn repo. See details in
> > the
> > > > how to
> > > > > >> > release doc about the publishing.)
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Regards,
> > > > > >> > Gabor
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:10 PM Antoine Pitrou <
> > [email protected]>
> > > >
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > I propose the following RC to be released as official Apache
> > > > Parquet
> > > > > >> > > Format 2.9.0 release.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > The commit id is b4f0c0a643a6ec1a7def37115dd6967ba9346df7
> > > > > >> > > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-parquet-format-2.9.0-rc0
> > > > > >> > > *
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >>
> > > >
> > https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/tree/b4f0c0a643a6ec1a7def37115dd6967ba9346df7
> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
> > > > > >> > > *
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >>
> > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/parquet/apache-parquet-format-2.9.0-rc0/
> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > You can find the KEYS file here:
> > > > > >> > > * https://downloads.apache.org/parquet/KEYS
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Binary artifacts are staged in Nexus here:
> > > > > >> > > *
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >>
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/parquet/parquet-format/
> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > This release includes the following important fixes and
> > > > improvements:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > * PARQUET-1996 - [Format] Add interoperable LZ4 codec,
> > deprecate
> > > > > >> existing
> > > > > >> > > LZ4 codec
> > > > > >> > > * PARQUET-2013 - [Format] Mention that converted types are
> > > > deprecated
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > ...among other changes (see CHANGES.md for full list).
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Please download, verify, and test.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Please vote in the next 72 hours.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Parquet 2.9.0
> > > > > >> > > [ ] +0
> > > > > >> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Regards
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Antoine.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >

Reply via email to