[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17781414#comment-17781414 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PARQUET-2371: ----------------------------------------- amousavigourabi opened a new pull request, #1181: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/1181 Make sure you have checked _all_ steps below. ### Jira - [x] My PR addresses the following [Parquet Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET/) issues and references them in the PR title. For example, "PARQUET-1234: My Parquet PR" - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-XXX - In case you are adding a dependency, check if the license complies with the [ASF 3rd Party License Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x). ### Tests - [x] My PR adds the following unit tests __OR__ does not need testing for this extremely good reason: No user facing changes, only resolves CI failure. ### Commits - [x] My commits all reference Jira issues in their subject lines. In addition, my commits follow the guidelines from "[How to write a good git commit message](http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/)": 1. Subject is separated from body by a blank line 1. Subject is limited to 50 characters (not including Jira issue reference) 1. Subject does not end with a period 1. Subject uses the imperative mood ("add", not "adding") 1. Body wraps at 72 characters 1. Body explains "what" and "why", not "how" ### Documentation - [x] In case of new functionality, my PR adds documentation that describes how to use it. - All the public functions and the classes in the PR contain Javadoc that explain what it does --- Japicmp failed on newly introduced classes, during review this did not cause a failure. This likely has something to do with the japicmp 0.18.1 update we pushed since then (for this, see #1176). Includes bumping japicmp to 0.18.2. The false positives were all under the banner of `CLASS_GENERIC_TEMPLATE_CHANGED`. Similar problems seem to have been reported before at siom79/japicmp#345. > Resolve japicmp failure for CI > ------------------------------ > > Key: PARQUET-2371 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2371 > Project: Parquet > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: parquet-mr > Reporter: Atour Mousavi Gourabi > Priority: Major > > Japicmp triggers on newly added methods, which have not been changed. This is > likely a japicmp bug. Excludes should be added for the affected classes, as > otherwise the CI job will not run anything after the japicmp goal. See the > discussion at https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/1141. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)