very heavy +1 

This would help a lot.

On Thu, May 16, 2024, at 4:19 AM, Gang Wu wrote:
> +1 on renaming the repo to reduce confusion.
>
> However, the java library still uses the "parquet-mr" prefix to write its
> application version [1] and it is consumed by downstream projects like
> parquet-cpp [2] as well.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fparquet-mr+parquet-mr+language%3AJava&type=code&l=Java
> [2]
> https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Farrow+parquet-mr+language%3AC%2B%2B+&type=code
>
> Best,
> Gang
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:47 AM Vinoo Ganesh <vinoo.gan...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1, I think this will make things a lot clearer! (non-binding)
>>
>> <vinoo.gan...@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:36 PM Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1000
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:30 AM Andrew Lamb <andrewlam...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Julien had a great suggestion[1] to  rename the parquet-mr repository
>> to
>> > > parquet-java to reduce confusion about its content.
>> > >
>> > >  > This looks great. Thank you for taking the initiative. Hadoop is not
>> > > required indeed. Perhaps at some point we should rename parquet-mr to
>> > > parquet-java?
>> > >
>> > > Having just renamed https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion to
>> > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion I think this would be a
>> relatively
>> > > painless experience as all existing links still work
>> > >
>> > > I filed a ticket here
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2475
>> > >
>> > > Thoughts?
>> > > Andrew
>> > >
>> > > [1]
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/59#pullrequestreview-2056038304
>> > >
>> >
>>

Reply via email to