I also unfortunately will not be able to make it today. As a brief update, I am working on finding someone to help with the Rust implementation of variant. Moving forward with Java and Python seems reasonable to me, though I would truly love to get a Rust implementation to ensure there is no potential gotcha's for a native implementation
Thanks, Andrew On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:41 AM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: > Hey Julien, > > I'm not going to be able to attend today's meeting, but just wanted to > follow up on a few of the items from the last meeting. > > With respect to the reference implementations for Variant, we had > discussed the possibility of Rust or C++, but those both have significant > work. The Java and native Python implementations are much closer and > should cover the concerns for verification of the spec. I still think > there will be work on the Rust side, but I don't think there's a C++ > implementation that would be in a state to open source. > > For the shredding spec, Micah, Ryan, Russel and I met and are closing in on > wording that everyone is happy with, so I expect that will close out > shortly. > > -Dan > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 7:41 AM Julien Le Dem <jul...@apache.org> wrote: > > > The next Parquet sync is today Jan 22nd at 9:30am PT - 12:30pm ET - > 6:30pm > > CET > > (in about 2hs) > > To join the invite: > > https://calendar.app.google/xXGgYU6evBArpzdZ9 > > Please contact me to be added to the recurring invite. > > Everybody is welcome, bring your topic or just listen in. > > Best > > Julien > > >
