+1 (binding) This is a long-awaited feature, and it is very exciting to see this happen. Thanks Gang and others for driving this!
Kind regards, Fokko Op do 6 feb 2025 om 18:52 schreef Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com>: > +1 (non-binding). > > Thanks for driving this Gang! This has been a huge collaboration, across > Parquet, Iceberg, Geo-Parquet, Sedona communities and many companies, and > the Iceberg proposal would have not been able to make much progress without > your help! I am excited to see this get closer to delivering great value > for geospatial use cases. > > Szehon > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 8:50 AM rdb...@gmail.com <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks to everyone that worked on getting this update done! It's been an > > amazing amount of discussion and I'm excited to see it ready to go. > > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 8:11 AM Jia Yu <ji...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > I’m really looking forward to this! It’s going to be a fantastic > addition > > > to the community. > > > > > > On 2025/02/06 15:54:49 Gang Wu wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > We would like to add geometry and geography logical types to Parquet: > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/240 > > > > > > > > This is proposed together with Apache Iceberg to support geospatial > > data: > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10981 > > > > > > > > Two prototype implementations are available: > > > > > > > > 1. Parquet Java: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/2971 > > > > 2. Parquet C++: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/43977 > > > > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Add these types to the format specification > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > [ ] -1 Do not add these types to the format specification because... > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gang > > > > > > > > > >
