Changing subject to not derail the interval discussion. On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 6:02 PM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 to FLBA and VLBA. What would BIT represent? Could you elaborate > > I think the intent would be boolean. > If one defines how bits are packed in bytes (MSB first or last, padded to byte boundary) do we still need a BIT physical type. Booleans will be packed this way in a VLBA. > On Wednesday, July 9, 2025, Alkis Evlogimenos > <alkis.evlogime...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 11:05 AM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> > wrote: > > > > > But if we were designing a new Parquet format from scratch, I would > > > definitely advocate for a reduced set of 3 physical types: BIT, FLBA > > > and VLBA. > > > > > > > +1 to FLBA and VLBA. What would BIT represent? Could you elaborate? > > >
