Thanks Jia and Dewey!

I wasn’t sure if we planned to have separate docs or a shared one, I just
put up this one to get things started. Please feel free to add your content
or make any changes as you see fit. Thanks!

– Arnav

On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 5:38 AM Arnav Balyan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just sharing this link so we can collaborate together!
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cx61Fp82HHB8TvePO4bFIbX1EXvv9Sy8Wx_YnyKeeW8/edit?tab=t.0
>
> It's a crude empty doc, please feel free to edit. It should have edit
> access for all thanks!
>
> Arnav
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 5:31 AM Jia Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Julien.
>>
>> I will start a google doc about the Parquet Geo type blog! I will also
>> ping Dewey for some help.
>>
>> Jia
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 4:57 PM Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > All we need is someone to start a draft on a google doc and share it on
>> the
>> > list to start collaborating :)
>> > (for each article)
>> > Thank you everyone who's chiming in.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Oct 5, 2025 at 3:20 AM Arnav Balyan <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Hi Julien and all,
>> > >
>> > > +1 - I’d be happy to contribute a short write-up on how Parquet
>> handles
>> > > complex nested data types.
>> > >
>> > > - Arnav
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 2025/10/02 23:43:52 Julien Le Dem wrote:
>> > > > I was thinking that we should talk more about the new features in
>> > > Parquet.
>> > > > Specifically, write blog posts about Variant or Geo types.
>> > > > How they came to be, what they enable, how they are integrated in
>> the
>> > > > ecosystem.
>> > > > The Parquet blog is only the release announcements for now (
>> > > > https://parquet.apache.org/blog/) and we can make it an
>> opportunity to
>> > > > spotlight some of the recent additions to the project.
>> > > > Contributors welcome.
>> > > > Some sources of inspiration:
>> > > > https://arrow.apache.org/blog/
>> > > > https://openlineage.io/blog
>> > > > https://datafusion.apache.org/blog/
>> > > > What do you think?
>> > >
>>
>

Reply via email to