On Mon, 30 Mar 2026 at 15:47, Aihua Xu <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah. It should be VARIANT(1). We have some places using VARIANT > incorrectly - we may not catch them when we finalized the spec.
thanks. That's what I suspected. > >
On Mon, 30 Mar 2026 at 15:47, Aihua Xu <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah. It should be VARIANT(1). We have some places using VARIANT > incorrectly - we may not catch them when we finalized the spec.
thanks. That's what I suspected. > >