+1 (mostly reviewed the spec) as I think Ed also tested to make sure that old java and c++ bindings won't break with this (sounds like rust versions pre-footer parsing changes might have issues)
On Monday, May 18, 2026, Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose a vote on adopting the format change described > in PARQUET-2249: IEEE 754 total order & NaN-counts. > > The discussion on the dev mailing list can be found here: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/lzh0dvrvnsy8kvflvl61nfbn6f9js81s > > The proposed format specification changes are available in the following > PR: > https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/514 > > To verify this design's compatibility and correctness, we developed > two independent PoC implementations: > 1. Java: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3393 > 2. Rust: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/9619 > > Both PoCs verified a test file produced by the Parquet-Java PoC: > https://github.com/apache/parquet-testing/pull/104 > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 Approve the proposed format change > [ ] +0 No opinion > [ ] -1 Do not approve (please provide specific reasons) > > Thanks, > Gang Wu >
