Thanks Fokko for initiating this!

I was thinking of including [1] as its vote thread [2] is about to
close. However, since releasing a new version of the Parquet format
and reviewing the Java PoC still requires time, I'm fine with skipping
it.

[1] https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3393
[2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/h0k0hqo0sojqphnbnrkp8b0gmwdzq9on

Best,
Gang

On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 10:04 PM Aaron Niskode-Dossett via dev
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I don't have the github access to add it to the issue, but I would suggest
> this PR (full disclosure, it's my PR).
>
> https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3378
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2026 at 7:17 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > It has been a while since the last major release, and I would suggest
> > doing the 1.18.0 release since a lot of work has been accumulated since
> > then. Besides then, it is way past the quarterly release cycle that we
> > suggest on the website[1].
> >
> > Please use this thread to share what we needs to be include in 1.18.0. We
> > can use the milestone[2] to track the progress.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Fokko
> >
> > [1]
> > https://parquet.apache.org/docs/contribution-guidelines/releasing/#release-cadence
> > [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/milestone/34
> >
>
>
> --
> Aaron Niskode-Dossett, Data Engineering -- Etsy

Reply via email to