Hi everyone,

Thanks again to everyone who joined and contributed. Here is a brief update
from the meeting.

We reviewed each field in the existing footer, discussing whether it should
be preserved and which module it should belong to.

We also established our benchmarking goals: we need microbenchmarks focused
on the footer itself, both to measure footer size and parsing performance.

We will start with the microbenchmarks and compare three footer
implementations:

   1.

   The current footer.
   2.

   The current footer with all proposed optimizations, including removing
   unused or duplicate fields and adding a jump table to support O(1) access
   to column metadata.
   3.

   The new modular footer.

To facilitate asynchronous collaboration, we would like to create a
separate Google Group for coordinating the implementation work. The
discussions will be highly specific and may include work-in-progress
implementation details, which could generate too many emails for the main
mailing list.

The Google Group is:
https://groups.google.com/g/apache-parquet-footer-working-group

The new group is also public and everyone is welcome to join if interested.
However, if anyone objects to using a separate group, we can conduct all
collaboration on the main mailing list instead. Please let me know if you
have any concerns.

Best,
Jiayi

Reply via email to