Hi Divjot, I reviewed the doc and it seems like a pragmatic solution to a long standing gap in parquet.
Let's maybe what until next week to collect feedback and if there are no objections we can hopefully start on POCs. Cheers, Micah On Wednesday, July 8, 2026, Divjot Arora via dev <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > We're interested in supporting the full SQL timestamp range (year 0001 to > 9999) in nanosecond precision. Parquet currently cannot do this via INT64 + > the TimestampType logical type, so I'm sharing a proposal to allow the > TimestampType annotation on FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY of size 12 (96-bits): > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H43RQZhWKcg9c4tJO5W87YxhbUxN7 > qGSFxJBrrwWOfY/edit?tab=t.0. > Please take a look if interested and feel free to leave comments on the > document. > > Best, > Divjot Arora >
