Thank you all who commented or suggested edits to the doc. Following up my proposal in the sync meeting today, I will wait another 24 hours and initiate the vote with the description here <https://docs.google.com/document/d/19bOTy1WcLs9NP88DrysG4wG50pM6gmIFaSEWzkxUeJw/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.qlhnuhge8ke2> that I sent on the list last week. This is your chance to chime in if you haven't done so yet. Best Julien
On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 12:38 PM Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> wrote: > TL;DR: please review the part in bold as the next step :) > > Thank you all who attended the "Parquet Versioning ad-hoc sync" today > and/or commented in the doc. This has been extremely helpful. > Notes were taken directly in the Versioning proposal > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/19bOTy1WcLs9NP88DrysG4wG50pM6gmIFaSEWzkxUeJw/edit?tab=t.0> > and > in our regular notes doc > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R_iP_Jf13oPj8R5AeuLk-W6T-FMB4OFKy5kRc79777k/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.m9jhd671ciwh> > . > There is a clear consensus emerging on versioning. > *We propose the following steps:* > - *Start a new vote to clarify more precisely what we are voting on. I > wrote down a draft here > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OXEtJ6f1g_8PQGhbhHwoEsrh3XCex8-Ftb44798EqwY/edit?tab=t.0> > to > finalize a description of principles* we agree is detailed enough without > devolving into a full implementation doc. > - Iterate on the *Versioning proposal* above as a follow up to finalize > the implementation of those principles. > - Optionally meet again after that if there are still points needing > interactive discussion. > > Best, > Julien >
