+1 (binding) Thank you for clarifying this Divjot
Andrew On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 1:27 PM Divjot Arora via dev <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to start a vote to adopt parquet-format PR 606 [1]. This PR > specifies graceful handling > for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations: in such cases, the > reader should drop the logical > type annotation and associated stats for the column (i.e. only parse based > on the physical type). There > are associated Java [2] and C++ [3] reference implementations, as well as a > parquet-testing PR [4] > to add a such a file. > > Please vote in the next 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 Approve the proposed format change > [ ] +0 No opinion > [ ] -1 Do not approve (please provide specific reasons) > > Cheers, > Div > > [1] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/606 > [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3711 > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/50909 > [4] https://github.com/apache/parquet-testing/pull/122 >
