+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Sep 8, 2026 at 1:10 PM Divjot Arora via dev <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to start a vote for to adopt parquet-format PR 601 [1]. This > PR allows > the TimestampType logical type annotation to annotate > FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY(12) > columns in order to support the full SQL timestamp range in nanoseconds. > All three time > units (millis/micros/nanos) are supported for such columns. There are Java > [2] and C++ [3] > reference implementations (the C++ one includes Parquet to Arrow type > conversion as well), > as well as a parquet-testing PR [4] to add a file with such columns. > > Please vote in the next 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 Approve the proposed format change > [ ] +0 No opinion > [ ] -1 Do not approve (please provide specific reasons) > > Cheers, > Div > > [1] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/601 > [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3680 > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/50916 > [4] https://github.com/apache/parquet-testing/pull/123 >
