[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14307727#comment-14307727
]
Ryan Blue commented on PARQUET-178:
-----------------------------------
The slf4j classes themselves weren't conflicting? I would have expected that to
be a larger issue. Does an exclusion work?
Any idea whether we can relocate the slf4j classes and still have them work? I
know they use strange tricks to switch between implementations.
> META-INF for slf4j should not be in parquet-format jar
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PARQUET-178
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-178
> Project: Parquet
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: parquet-format
> Affects Versions: 1.6.0rc2
> Reporter: koert kuipers
> Priority: Minor
>
> {noformat}
> $ jar tf parquet-format-2.2.0-rc1.jar | grep org\\.slf
> META-INF/maven/org.slf4j/
> META-INF/maven/org.slf4j/slf4j-api/
> META-INF/maven/org.slf4j/slf4j-api/pom.xml
> META-INF/maven/org.slf4j/slf4j-api/pom.properties
> {noformat}
> It is not clear to me why these are here. I suspect they should not be.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
