[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858509#action_12858509
]
Ted Dunning commented on PDFBOX-693:
------------------------------------
So Mel, if you already have pdfBox in production it sounds like you would find
commons logging acceptable since it is already in the game?
Surely you aren't voting -1 on reducing the code to a single logging package,
are you?
> Migrate to slf4j from java.util.logging / commons logging
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PDFBOX-693
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-693
> Project: PDFBox
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Sascha Szott
>
> Please consider a migration from java.util.logging / commons logging to slf4j.
> At the moment two different logging APIs are in use. As far as I have
> observed, commons logging is used as the primary logging framework with the
> exception of class org.apache.pdfbox.encoding.Encoding in which
> java.util.logging is used.
> By using slf4j, the choice of the logging API could be left up to the user.
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
