[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858539#action_12858539
]
Jukka Zitting commented on PDFBOX-693:
--------------------------------------
I adjusted the Encoding class to use commons-logging in revision 935604, as
that's the logging framework we're using since PDFBOX-472.
As for switching to slf4j or jul, I agree with Mel that the benefits of doing
so are not big enough. You can still use PDFBox with SLF4J if you replace the
commons-logging jar with jcl-over-slf4j. And if you prefer JUL, commons-logging
will automatically default to logging via JUL if no other logging framework is
available or configured.
> Migrate to slf4j from java.util.logging / commons logging
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PDFBOX-693
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-693
> Project: PDFBox
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Sascha Szott
>
> Please consider a migration from java.util.logging / commons logging to slf4j.
> At the moment two different logging APIs are in use. As far as I have
> observed, commons logging is used as the primary logging framework with the
> exception of class org.apache.pdfbox.encoding.Encoding in which
> java.util.logging is used.
> By using slf4j, the choice of the logging API could be left up to the user.
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
