Hello, It's nice, to meet you. :) At the moment, I think the most important parts are:
- Part 3: PAdES Enhanced – PAdES-Basic Electronic Signatures and PAdES-Explicit Policy Electronic Signatures Profiles - Part 4: PAdES Long Term – PAdES-Long Term Validation Profile Also API must be very simple -for this signbox architecture will be like this - we just create signature object and pass it an arguments and call sign method. I've already implement time stamp time signature (PDFBOX-1847<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1847> ). Now I will implement TSA Document level signature. Then I will implement PAdES Long Term (This means that we must create Document Secure Store) :) thanks, Best regards On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Thomas Chojecki <[email protected]> wrote: > Bump this mail for Vakhtang. :) > > Am 2014-01-09 12:43, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: > >> Hi Vakhtang, hi Thomas, >> >> signing a PDF seems to be one of the top use cases for PDFBox. Maybe >> you can outline what has to be done to a ‚core‘ of PDFBox i.e. what >> might be missing from a PDF perspective and what is part of a signing >> application. Having a reference implementation for signing using >> PDFbox would be very good. And as modularization is one of the themes >> of PDFBox 2 we could organize it accordingly. >> >> BR >> >> Maruan >> >> Am 09.01.2014 um 12:30 schrieb Thomas Chojecki <[email protected]>: >> >> Am 2014-01-09 11:45, schrieb Vakhtang koroghlishvili: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>> Hi Vakhtang, >>> >>> >>> I can implement this feature :) >>>> 2) After I implement TSA time feature, which I have written above, I >>>> think >>>> It will be very good if we implement (I can implement this too) PADES >>>> LTV >>>> profile. In the other words, it is PAdES-Long Term Validation Profile. >>>> See >>>> specification doc: >>>> http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/102700_102799/ >>>> 10277804/01.01.01_60/ts_10277804v010101p.pdf >>>> >>> >>> This would be great. Maybe we can someday create a new subproject >>> signbox or something else that will be shipped within the pdfbox project. >>> So custom solution isn't needed. >>> >>> Since middle of december I'm sitting without internet and waiting for >>> the provider. So I can only doing mail support this time. >>> >>> >>> I think they are very important and usefull features. :) >>>> >>> Of course. This would be an important step to improving the signature >>> functionality. The last ETSI Plugtest (interop test) shows, that there are >>> some companies using pdfbox for his signature solution. Maybe a general >>> base would help to be more interoperable to other libraries. >>> >>> >>> So, what do you think about this features? :) >>>> >>> Great idea. And thanks for investing so much time to improve the >>> signature base. >>> >>> Best regards >>> Thomas >>> >>
