Hi, I'm currently on a trip so won't be able to fix it today.
BR Maruan > Am 18.04.2014 um 16:58 schrieb Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de>: > > Now only Maruans issue is open. I'm currently fixing more javadoc stuff for > 1.8 and 2.0 and will comment when done. This will be finished in 15 min. > > After that, two possibilities IMO: > - if you can also work on it tomorrow, just wait for Maruan > - if you can only work on it today, then set the issue to resolved after I'm > done and Maruan can open a new issue. > > Tilman > > Am 18.04.2014 16:13, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: >> Hi, >> >> Am 18.04.2014 15:52, schrieb Tilman Hausherr: >>> Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes >>> >>> Yes! >>> >>>> WDYT? >>>> Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk >>>> which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open >>>> issues >>>> [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5? >>> >>> PDFBOX-1946 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946>: person >>> didn't >>> answer => set to resolve >> +1 >> >>> PDFBOX-1977 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977>: LZW bug has >>> been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really know >>> what to >>> do, I don't have the time to create a "perfect" test, i.e. that would 1. >>> include >>> the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, deterministic and >>> non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change the title to the >>> bug >>> only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 only. WDYT? >> Sounds reasonable. Will you do that? >> >>> PDFBOX-2026: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026>IMO the bug >>> has >>> been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve. >> +1 >> >>> PDFBOX-1897 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897>: I'll let >>> Maruan >>> resolve that one >>> >>> Tilman >>> >>>> >>>> BR >>>> Andreas Lehmkühler >>>> >>>> [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ >> >> Thanks for the fast reply >> >> BR >> Andreas Lehmkühler >
