Hi there,

there is an issue with my local copy of pdfbox atm - need a little more time to 
resolve the issue.

BR
Maruan Sahyoun

Am 18.04.2014 um 17:03 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun <sahy...@fileaffairs.de>:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm currently on a trip so won't be able to fix it today.
> 
> BR
> 
> Maruan
> 
>> Am 18.04.2014 um 16:58 schrieb Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de>:
>> 
>> Now only Maruans issue is open. I'm currently fixing more javadoc stuff for 
>> 1.8 and 2.0 and will comment when done. This will be finished in 15 min.
>> 
>> After that, two possibilities IMO:
>> - if you can also work on it tomorrow, just wait for Maruan
>> - if you can only work on it today, then set the issue to resolved after I'm 
>> done and Maruan can open a new issue.
>> 
>> Tilman
>> 
>> Am 18.04.2014 16:13, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Am 18.04.2014 15:52, schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
>>>> Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes
>>>> 
>>>> Yes!
>>>> 
>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>> Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk
>>>>> which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open 
>>>>> issues
>>>>> [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5?
>>>> 
>>>> PDFBOX-1946 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946>: person 
>>>> didn't
>>>> answer => set to resolve
>>> +1
>>> 
>>>> PDFBOX-1977 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977>: LZW bug 
>>>> has
>>>> been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really know 
>>>> what to
>>>> do, I don't have the time to create a "perfect" test, i.e. that would 1. 
>>>> include
>>>> the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, deterministic and
>>>> non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change the title to the 
>>>> bug
>>>> only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 only. WDYT?
>>> Sounds reasonable. Will you do that?
>>> 
>>>> PDFBOX-2026: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026>IMO the 
>>>> bug has
>>>> been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve.
>>> +1
>>> 
>>>> PDFBOX-1897 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897>: I'll let 
>>>> Maruan
>>>> resolve that one
>>>> 
>>>> Tilman
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> BR
>>>>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>>>>> 
>>>>> [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the fast reply
>>> 
>>> BR
>>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>> 

Reply via email to