> On 12 Jul 2015, at 15:17, Maruan Sahyoun <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > there are some inconsistencies between the annotation package and the form > package how static final fields are handled. The classes in the annotation > package have these public. The classes in the form package have these private > or package private. I'd propose to make them public in the form package.
I thought the goal for 2.0 was to move from using integer constants to enums? — John > Furthermore there are some minor differences between method names such as > setReadOnly() in annotation and setReadonly() in form which I'd like to make > consistent prior to 2.0.0 Yes, that definitely wants to be setReadOnly(). > WDYT? > > BR > Maruan > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
