> Am 13.07.2015 um 08:55 schrieb John Hewson <[email protected]>:
> 
> 
>> On 12 Jul 2015, at 22:50, Maruan Sahyoun <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 13.07.2015 um 03:18 schrieb John Hewson <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 12 Jul 2015, at 15:17, Maruan Sahyoun <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> there are some inconsistencies between the annotation package and the form 
>>>> package how static final fields are handled. The classes in the annotation 
>>>> package have these public. The classes in the form package have these 
>>>> private or package private. I'd propose to make them public in the form 
>>>> package. 
>>> 
>>> I thought the goal for 2.0 was to move from using integer constants to 
>>> enums?
>> 
>> Good point. Why not change the visibility first and if time permits move to 
>> enums? ATM the AP issues for fields are more important. 
> 
> One reason not to change would be that once it’s public there’s no going back 
> if we don’t move to enums before 2.0.

yes, otoh it would leave us with the inconsitency between annotation and form 
which is also not good

Maruan

> 
> — John
> 
>>> 
>>> — John
>>> 
>>>> Furthermore there are some minor differences between method names such as 
>>>> setReadOnly() in annotation and setReadonly() in form which I'd like to 
>>>> make consistent prior to 2.0.0
>>> 
>>> Yes, that definitely wants to be setReadOnly().
>> 
>> Will change it.
>> 
>> BR
>> Maruan
>> 
>>> 
>>>> WDYT?
>>>> 
>>>> BR
>>>> Maruan
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to