With lots of empty pages... -----Original Message----- From: Allison, Timothy B. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 3:57 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: 2.0.6 release ?
Doh. AR can't open it. Sorry. Chrome appears to be able to open it. -----Original Message----- From: Allison, Timothy B. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 3:56 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: 2.0.6 release ? commoncrawl2_likely_broken/WL/WL4ZBGPG6543HIT24KCT7XZUIL5NBQ6K throws NPE and opens without complaint in AR. -----Original Message----- From: Tilman Hausherr [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 3:49 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: 2.0.6 release ? You caught me... I haven't checked these yet. But I did now, with MD6X34Z6CODIJODXTOH5E6WJ7VUUPITO.pdf 3TE3TRHZVL2ZJGUUASZEWNOY6DXRTTEK.ashx IDEJP3MH4FCZNNTWQDMZ6TD2MOIPAYZ7.ashx but they don't throw an NPE anymore now. Oops... I see I have that check you mention in my code, it has been there for months and I forgot to make an issue. But after removing it, it still works with the three files... so the question is, can this parameter ever be null, or not? Tilman Am 09.05.2017 um 21:34 schrieb Allison, Timothy B.: > Should we return false if the node is null in PDPageTree#isPageTreeNode (66 > new NPE exceptions)? Has this been fixed, or would that cause unintended > problems? > > /** > * Returns true if the node is a page tree node (i.e. and intermediate). > */ > private boolean isPageTreeNode(COSDictionary node ) > { > // some files such as PDFBOX-2250-229205.pdf don't have Pages set as > the Type, so we have > // to check for the presence of Kids too > return node.getCOSName(COSName.TYPE) == COSName.PAGES || > node.containsKey(COSName.KIDS); > } > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tilman Hausherr [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 3:20 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: 2.0.6 release ? > > Am 09.05.2017 um 21:01 schrieb Allison, Timothy B.: >>> I've fixed all remaining regression tickets (in the end it was >>> exactly 1) >> Great! Thank you! >> >> Let me know when I should kick off another eval. > > Yes, please do. > > Thanks > > Tilman > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For > additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For > additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] B KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB [ X ܚX KK[XZ[ ] ][ X ܚX P \X K ܙ B ܈Y][ۘ[ [X[ K[XZ[ ] Z[ \X K ܙ B B
