Am 19.08.2017 um 14:30 schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
Thanks for doing all these commits. I did a build and ran our own PDF rendering
tests and it fixes my own issues, and also a bug from the google code days, and
a file I collected from the PDF.js project.
About the pom.xml: you are using
<groupId>org.apache.pdfbox.jbig2</groupId>
<artifactId>pdfbox-jbig2-imageio</artifactId>
<version>3.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
Shouldn't this be more like this?
<groupId>org.apache.pdfbox</groupId>
<artifactId>jbig2-imageio</artifactId>
<version>3.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
+1, there is one superfluous "pdfbox". Besides some other minor things to be
adjusted we have to discuss how the plugin shall be integrated.
IMHO, we should keep it independent, so that we could cut independent releases
of the plugin and pdfbox. Doing so, we have to reorg our svn repository. We have
to create a pdfbox directory in trunk and move everything to that directory.
There will be another directoy jbig2 for the sources of the plugin.
WDYT?
Re committers, I'd favour "that the relevant developers become ASF committers".
I wasn't involved at that time, but it's the way it was done with PaDaF (now
preflight), two people involved became committers.
+1, as I already said in my other post, I'm thinking about a vote like the one
we used for the padaf integration, see [1]
Tilman
Andreas
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/01bf8acb608ae460947832b4daf83e3242d00efc876711d5c1070078@1310585500@%3Cdev.pdfbox.apache.org%3E
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
