Yeah the issue is more about having to repeat this discussion on every
single PR due to having to agree upon what is a minor or a major change,
not about this one specifically. Another thing to keep in mind is that
evidently people also have different opinions on what is a minor change and
what is a major. This itself is completely fine and normal, the problem is
that depending on who is reviewing a certain PR we can get
different results of what is minor vs major and since we are dealing with
legal issues here this is not exactly desirable.

This is why I am personally leaning much towards the "lets delegate all
these header decisions due to minor vs major change at once just before
release". With such a strategy it's easier to get everyone's opinion from
the PMCC on the matter, collectively come to some conclusion and then as a
result of that conclusion we can create more clear rules going forward.

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:51 PM PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote:

> In https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/50 - I'd prefer to add
> the ASF header to the CopyrightHeader.scala file - after the existing
> Lightbend header.
>
> I think the change is non-trivial.
>
> I think this policy would allow us to make some progress. At the moment,
> the header issue is really jamming up the works.
>
> On 2022/11/17 09:21:21 Matthew Benedict de Detrich wrote:
> > Currently there appears to be confusion and/or disagreement regarding
> what
> > constitutes a minor vs major change. For context please have a look at
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/38#issuecomment-1311468140
> .
> >
> > The main problem I foresee (which arguably in my opinion has already
> > started) is that due to the definition of minor vs major being quite
> > subjective, it's already started holding up the progress of doing work on
> > Pekko. This has already started with the PR at
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/50 and also at
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko-http/pull/8#issuecomment-1316786937
> .
> > In short, if we are going to debate on every single PR what constitutes a
> > minor or major change it's going to significantly decrease the velocity
> of
> > getting stuff done.
> >
> > Would it be possible for us to come to a more technical/strict definition
> > on what constitutes a minor or major change? The current disagreement
> from
> > the previously mentioned PR's is about whether a change to the build
> (which
> > has no effect on the execution/use of the software) is major but there
> will
> > undoubtedly be many more cases in the future (i.e. does the package
> rename
> > from akka to org.apache.pekko also count as a major change? This one is a
> > lot less clear).
> >
> > Alternatively is it also possible for us to suspend the changing of
> source
> > headers depending on minor/major changes just before we decide to make a
> > release? This way we can completely eliminate overhead as we work
> towards a
> > release and then when a release is ready someone can create a PR with the
> > necessary header changes and in that PR itself we can discuss what is
> minor
> > and what is major. This can then be tackled at once with increased focus
> > and efficiency rather than having to do this work on every PR which
> incurs
> > a lot of overhead. This is especially appealing if the decision of minor
> vs
> > major is going to remain largely subjective.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> > --
> >
> > Matthew de Detrich
> >
> > *Aiven Deutschland GmbH*
> >
> > Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin
> >
> > Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B
> >
> > Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen
> >
> > *m:* +491603708037
> >
> > *w:* aiven.io *e:* [email protected]
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

-- 

Matthew de Detrich

*Aiven Deutschland GmbH*

Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin

Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B

Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen

*m:* +491603708037

*w:* aiven.io *e:* [email protected]

Reply via email to