On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 4:55 PM Claude Warren, Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > The only question is whether changes are significant enough to > warrant adding a license header.
That might be true but ASL states that > b. You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices stating that > You changed the files; and This seems completely unambiguous, so if we want to change any file in any way, we must add a notice to that file to comply with the original license terms (but not necessarily add a new license). (In that regard the "Treatment of Third-Party Works" seems incomplete as it is missing a clause that requires to comply with any rules stemming from the original licenses.) If we are required to add notices to most files anyway, why not add a proper section that covers all cases and can be included right from the beginning? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
