The Lightbend release notes were already removed. I'm talking about the release process. Files like: * https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/blob/main/RELEASING.md * https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/blob/main/scripts/release-train-issue-template.md
They are sort of getting in the way when trying to replace Lightbend/Akka branding. We have other discussions open about the release process and I really don't want this thread to turn into an offset of those threads. The Pekko release notes should also be discussed in their own separate thread. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-612 is a discussion about the Github release feature. On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 14:45, Matthew Benedict de Detrich <[email protected]> wrote: > > > cwiki feels better controlled and less likely to be accidentally modified > without discussion on the mailing list. > > If the goal is to optimize for minimization of accidental modification > without proper review, I would actually think purely as a tool having the > release notes in github would be far more effective due to its review > system (i.e. PR's have to be approved before the matter of fact). There are > also other technical advantages to having release notes on github (wiki or > otherwise), i.e. release notes have a tendency to reference actual code (I > can easily see this in our case with referencing and then documenting sbt > tasks/commands) which due to our source code also being hosted in github is > both more ergonomic and also less likely to get out of sync (which is a > common occurrence with disparate systems). > > That being said, it does seem there is strong precedent for having the > release notes in cwiki rather than github (wiki or otherwise) and I don't > know if an escape hatch of "having release notes on github with a reference > on cwiki" is desirable or even appropriate. > > Regarding the Lightbend release notes, I am definitely all in for removing > them and referencing their site/docs if needed. > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 2:17 PM Claude Warren, Jr > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > cwiki feels better controlled and less likely to be accidentally modified > > without discussion on the mailing list. > > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 12:44 PM PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > So far, when updating the Github and Paradox markdown files, I've tended > > > to leave the Lightbend specific release train scripts and docs behind. > > Our > > > release process will be similar but different. I think maybe, it's about > > > time to start pruning it. It's easier if anyone wants to reference the > > > Lightbend process to read it from the Akka repos or web site. > > > > > > It's a separate discussion but I'd prefer to see the Apache Pekko release > > > docs end up on cwiki.apache.org as opposed to in the Github repos. > > > > > > Anyone with any opinions about this? > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthew de Detrich > > *Aiven Deutschland GmbH* > > Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin > > Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B > > Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen > > *m:* +491603708037 > > *w:* aiven.io *e:* [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
