I expect we get a 1.1.0 final release before September, wdyt. for the features, I think we can delay things if them miss the release train.
I'm a little busy at work right now, and my wife just visit me in Hangzhou so I will not have time this and the next weekend :( 何品 Arnout Engelen <enge...@apache.org> 于2024年8月8日周四 18:48写道： > I think a 1.1.0 release would be great! > > I'm not sure we ever discussed what it means for an issue or PR to be added > to a milestone 'X' - does it mean "it is a requirement for version X", "we > would like it to be in X but don't hold up the release for it", or merely > "this will not make it into version prior to X"? > > I think we should ideally only have "requirement for version X" tasks if we > know they cannot be added later without breaking binary compatibility, or > when they're meant to solve regressions compared to the previous version. > > > Kind regards, > > Arnout > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 11:46 AM PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > I'm wondering if we should try to focus on getting a 1.1.0 release out. > > It's about a year since the 1.0.0 release. > > We have 1.1.0-M1 out [1] and there is a GitHub milestone [2] tracking > > some further changes. > > I would favour skipping an M2 release as I don't think anything > > currently merged or awaiting merge causes major concerns. > > What do people think? > > > > Thanks, > > PJ > > > > [1] > > https://pekko.apache.org/docs/pekko/1.1/release-notes/releases-1.1.html > > [2] https://github.com/apache/pekko/milestone/7 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org > > > > > > -- > Arnout Engelen > ASF Security Response > Apache Pekko PMC member, ASF Member > NixOS Committer > Independent Open Source consultant >
