Yes, Let's process it, other pr can come next.

But should we wait at least a week after the  RC1?
'
何品


PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> 于2024年8月29日周四 02:14写道:

> I think the final changes are in and I plan to proceed with an RC1.
>
> On 2024/08/23 15:04:39 PJ Fanning wrote:
> > There are a few open PRs that have been active or merged in the last few
> weeks. I'm going to push out all the other unfinished 1.1.0 milestone [1]
> PRs to the 1.1.1 milestone [2].
> > If anyone is unhappy about any of the PRs that are being dropped from
> 1.1.0, can you get in touch in the next few days?
> > I'm hoping to do an RC for 1.1.0 around Thursday 29th.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/pekko/milestone/7
> > [2] https://github.com/apache/pekko/milestone/10
> >
> > On 2024/08/14 17:07:54 PJ Fanning wrote:
> > > I'm happy enough to press on with a release candidate around the end
> of the month or early next month.
> > > There are a few items open in the milestone but I think they can be
> delayed to 1.1.1. I have opened a new milestone for 1.1.1 [1].
> > > There are a couple of the open issues/PRs in 1.1.0 that seem to be
> getting some attention. I'm happy to wait a week and anything that is not
> progressing inside that week, I think we should move those to 1.1.1.
> > > Some of the open issues/PRs may need new API methods but I think we
> can add some new methods in 1.1.1 as long as we don't damage binary
> compatibility with 1.1.0.
> > > Is this approach ok for everyone?
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/pekko/milestones
> > >
> > > On 2024/08/08 13:31:43 kerr wrote:
> > > > I expect we get a 1.1.0 final release before September, wdyt.
> > > >
> > > > for the features, I think we can delay things if them miss the
> release
> > > > train.
> > > >
> > > > I'm a little busy at work right now, and my wife just visit me in
> Hangzhou
> > > > so I will not have time this and the next weekend :(
> > > > 何品
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Arnout Engelen <enge...@apache.org> 于2024年8月8日周四 18:48写道:
> > > >
> > > > > I think a 1.1.0 release would be great!
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure we ever discussed what it means for an issue or PR to
> be added
> > > > > to a milestone 'X' - does it mean "it is a requirement for version
> X", "we
> > > > > would like it to be in X but don't hold up the release for it", or
> merely
> > > > > "this will not make it into version prior to X"?
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we should ideally only have "requirement for version X"
> tasks if we
> > > > > know they cannot be added later without breaking binary
> compatibility, or
> > > > > when they're meant to solve regressions compared to the previous
> version.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Arnout
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 11:46 AM PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > I'm wondering if we should try to focus on getting a 1.1.0
> release out.
> > > > > > It's about a year since the 1.0.0 release.
> > > > > > We have 1.1.0-M1 out [1] and there is a GitHub milestone [2]
> tracking
> > > > > > some further changes.
> > > > > > I would favour skipping an M2 release as I don't think anything
> > > > > > currently merged or awaiting merge causes major concerns.
> > > > > > What do people think?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > PJ
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> https://pekko.apache.org/docs/pekko/1.1/release-notes/releases-1.1.html
> > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/pekko/milestone/7
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Arnout Engelen
> > > > > ASF Security Response
> > > > > Apache Pekko PMC member, ASF Member
> > > > > NixOS Committer
> > > > > Independent Open Source consultant
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to