> -----Original Message-----
> From: Salvador Ortiz Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 1:24 PM
> To: Geoffrey Young
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: no_cache(1)
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
> > hi all...
> >
> > should $r->no_cache(1) be setting err_headers_out instead of
> > headers_out?
>
> I don't think so.
>
> > I just noticed that if I set no_cache(1) and return REDIRECT
> > the headers do not include the no cache stuff...
>
> HTTP/1.1 states that a REDIRECT (status code 302) isn't cacheable by
> default.
>
> In general the client agent SHOULD NOT cache any error response, so a
> $r->no_cache(1) is valid only for a direct (without errors) response.
cool beans - I actually had the redirects involved with the handling of
ErrorDocuments in mind, which sounds as if it's a non-issue, then...
thanks for clearing that up...
--Geoff
>
>
> Salvador Ortiz
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
